DOS ain't dead - mTCP DOS TCP/IP apps for small machines

mTCP DOS TCP/IP apps for small machines (Announce)

posted by Japheth , Germany (South), 22.01.2010, 09:47

> I will disclose that this is not open source (yet). I am willing to talk
> to people about code in private. It's not all done yet so I'd like to
> keep some control before releasing my terror on the world. ;-0
>
> If you have comments or requests I try to be responsive.

Thanks! AFAICS one can just download some applications, which include the statically linked TCP code. So the only tests which can be done are to try out these applications? Perhaps there's a possibility to provide at least a static library and a (small) documentation how your TCP API is supposed to be used? No big problem if the code is restricted to the Borland C v3.0 compiler.

---
MS-DOS forever!

Post reply

Complete thread:

mTCP DOS TCP/IP apps for small machines - mbbrutman, 21.01.2010, 18:06 (Announce)
- mTCP DOS TCP/IP apps for small machines - Japheth, 22.01.2010, 09:47
  - mTCP DOS TCP/IP apps for small machines - mbbrutman, 22.01.2010, 16:56
    - mTCP DOS TCP/IP apps for small machines - mbbrutman, 07.02.2010, 16:35
  - Forget the library .. time to open-source the code? - mbbrutman, 14.03.2010, 03:22
    - Forget the library .. time to open-source the code? - Rugxulo, 14.03.2010, 03:56
      - Forget the library .. time to open-source the code? - mbbrutman, 14.03.2010, 15:01
        mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - Arjay, 27.06.2010, 22:27
        mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - Rugxulo, 28.06.2010, 06:30
        mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - DOS386, 28.06.2010, 12:05
        mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - Arjay, 28.06.2010, 14:22
        mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - mbbrutman, 01.07.2010, 07:08
        mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - Laaca, 01.07.2010, 13:14
        mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - mbbrutman, 01.07.2010, 16:06
        mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - DOS386, 01.07.2010, 13:20
        mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - mbbrutman, 01.07.2010, 16:03
        mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - Laaca, 01.07.2010, 19:16
        mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - mbbrutman, 03.07.2010, 16:04
        mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - DOS386, 14.07.2010, 03:51
- mTCP interfacing with TINY remote control for DOS? - Arjay, 20.07.2010, 12:41
  - mTCP interfacing with TINY remote control for DOS? - mbbrutman, 20.07.2010, 16:09
    - mTCP interfacing with TINY remote control for DOS? - Arjay, 20.07.2010, 17:49
- mTCP DOS - NC documentation issue (design bug)? - Arjay, 20.07.2010, 14:07
  - mTCP DOS - NC documentation issue (design bug)? - mbbrutman, 20.07.2010, 15:22
    - mTCP DOS - NC documentation issue (design bug)? - Arjay, 20.07.2010, 17:30
      - mTCP DOS - NC documentation issue (design bug)? - mbbrutman, 20.07.2010, 19:32
        mTCP DOS - NC documentation issue (design bug)? - Arjay, 20.07.2010, 21:56
        FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - DOS386, 23.07.2010, 07:27
        FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - mbbrutman, 24.07.2010, 01:04
        FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - DOS386, 24.07.2010, 12:12
        FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - Japheth, 24.07.2010, 15:31
        FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - DOS386, 24.07.2010, 15:36
        FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - mbbrutman, 24.07.2010, 16:23
        FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - Japheth, 24.07.2010, 16:57
        FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - mbbrutman, 25.07.2010, 01:35
        FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - Rugxulo, 25.07.2010, 05:34
        FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - DOS386, 25.07.2010, 06:16
        FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - mbbrutman, 25.07.2010, 17:17
        FTP ASCII vs binary "image" | NTLFN issues - DOS386, 26.07.2010, 02:03
        FTP ASCII vs binary "image" | NTLFN issues - mbbrutman, 26.07.2010, 03:11
        FTP ASCII vs binary "image" | NTLFN issues - DOS386, 27.07.2010, 02:53
        FTP ASCII vs binary "image" | NTLFN issues - mbbrutman, 27.07.2010, 03:31
        FTP ASCII vs binary "image" | NTLFN issues - DOS386, 27.07.2010, 03:40