Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the board
Thread view  Mix view  Order
RayeR

Homepage

CZ,
16.02.2018, 19:51
 

CPUID 2.19 (Announce)

Hi, after some years I updeted my multiplatform CPUID utility again
http://rayer.g6.cz/programm/programe.htm#CPUID

---
DOS gives me freedom to unlimited HW access.

rr

Homepage E-mail

Berlin, Germany,
17.02.2018, 21:18

@ RayeR

CPUID 2.19

> Hi, after some years I updeted my multiplatform CPUID utility again
> http://rayer.g6.cz/programm/programe.htm#CPUID

Successfully tested on my ThinkPad R500 running Windows XP SP3:

Simple CPU info utility 2.19 (C) 2001-2018 by Martin Rehak; rayer@seznam.cz
Compiled by GCC 6.3.0 at 03:16:16, Feb 17 2018
(Win9x/NT/2K/XP compatability)
CPUID supported (opcode 0FA2h), 14 levels, 9 extended levels
CPUID level  0: EAX = 0000000D, EBX = 756E6547, ECX = 6C65746E, EDX = 49656E69
CPUID level  1: EAX = 0001067A, EBX = 00020800, ECX = 0408E3FD, EDX = BFEBFBFF
CPUID level  2: EAX = 05B0B101, EBX = 005657F0, ECX = 00000000, EDX = 2CB43048
CPUID level  3: EAX = 00000000, EBX = 00000000, ECX = 00000000, EDX = 00000000
CPUID level  4: EAX = 04000121, EBX = 01C0003F, ECX = 0000003F, EDX = 00000001
CPUID level  5: EAX = 00000040, EBX = 00000040, ECX = 00000003, EDX = 03122220
CPUID level  6: EAX = 00000003, EBX = 00000002, ECX = 00000003, EDX = 00000000
CPUID level  7: EAX = 00000000, EBX = 00000000, ECX = 00000000, EDX = 00000000
CPUID level  8: EAX = 00000400, EBX = 00000000, ECX = 00000000, EDX = 00000000
CPUID level  9: EAX = 00000000, EBX = 00000000, ECX = 00000000, EDX = 00000000
CPUID level 10: EAX = 07280202, EBX = 00000000, ECX = 00000000, EDX = 00000503
CPUID level 11: EAX = 00000000, EBX = 00000000, ECX = 00000000, EDX = 00000000
CPUID level 12: EAX = 00000000, EBX = 00000000, ECX = 00000000, EDX = 00000000
CPUID level 13: EAX = 00000003, EBX = 00000240, ECX = 00000240, EDX = 00000000
CPUID xlevel 0: EAX = 80000008, EBX = 00000000, ECX = 00000000, EDX = 00000000
CPUID xlevel 1: EAX = 00000000, EBX = 00000000, ECX = 00000001, EDX = 20100000
CPUID xlevel 2: EAX = 65746E49, EBX = 2952286C, ECX = 726F4320, EDX = 4D542865
CPUID xlevel 3: EAX = 44203229, EBX = 43206F75, ECX = 20205550, EDX = 50202020
CPUID xlevel 4: EAX = 30303738, EBX = 20402020, ECX = 33352E32, EDX = 007A4847
CPUID xlevel 5: EAX = 00000000, EBX = 00000000, ECX = 00000000, EDX = 00000000
CPUID xlevel 6: EAX = 00000000, EBX = 00000000, ECX = 0C006040, EDX = 00000000
CPUID xlevel 7: EAX = 00000000, EBX = 00000000, ECX = 00000000, EDX = 00000000
CPUID xlevel 8: EAX = 00003024, EBX = 00000000, ECX = 00000000, EDX = 00000000

CPU vendor name: GenuineIntel
CPU name: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU     P8700  @ 2.53GHz
CPU ID: 1067A - type: 0 (primary), family: 6 (P6), model: 7, stepping: A
CPU cores: 2, nominal speed: 2533MHz = 9.5*266MHz; L1 cache = 64kB, 8-way
TSC measured CPU core speed: 492MHz = 6.0*82MHz; L2 cache = 3072kB, 12-way
IA64: 0, E64MT: 1, VM Ext.: 1, FPU: 1, FMA: 0
AVX2: 0, AVX: 0, SSE4.2: 0, SSE4.1: 1, SSSE3: 1, SSE3: 1, SSE2: 1, SSE: 1
MMX: 1, AES: 0, V86 Mode Ext.: 1, XD bit: 1, Safer Mode eXt.(SMX): 1, SMEP: 0
Multi-Threading: 1, Enhanced Speed Step: 1, Thermal monitor 2: 1, ACPI: 1
CPU s/n: 0, Auto-TCC: 1, 4MB pages: 1, 1GB pages: 0, Page Attr. Table: 1
Phys./Virtual address width: 36b/48b, PAE-36b: 1, PSE-36b: 1, Page Glob.En: 1
Memory Type Range Registers (MTRR): 1, CFLUSH chsize = 8, CMPXCHG8B/16B: 1/1
CMOV: 1, FXSAVE&FXSTOR: 1, PCLMULDQ: 0, MOVBE: 0, POPCNT: 0, OS/XSAVE: 0/1
Debug Trace Store 32/64: 1/1, Debug Ext.: 1, RDTSC: 1, SYSENTER&SYSEXIT: 1
Machine-Check Except.: 1, Machine-Check Arch. & MCG_CAP reg.: 1, CLFLUSH: 1
MSR: 1, APIC/xAPIC (SMP support): 1/0, APIC ID = 0, APIC ID mask: PPPPPPPC
DTS Tjmax = 100C, core(s): Tj[0] = 30C, Tj[1] = 30C
EIST: on, IDA: off, Vcore = 0.987V [1.113V - 1.188V], multiplier [6.0 - 9.5]
DB CPU name: Core 2 Duo/Quad/Xeon Wolfdale 2000-3333, LGA 775, 45nm

---
Forum admin

Zyzzle

18.02.2018, 22:24

@ RayeR

CPUID 2.19

> Hi, after some years I updeted my multiplatform CPUID utility again
> http://rayer.g6.cz/programm/programe.htm#CPUID

Thanks very much for the update. It is great to have a current CPU-detection program for DOS!

Tested on Baytrail system, works very well.

Rugxulo

Homepage

Usono,
19.02.2018, 00:01

@ rr

CPUID 2.19

> > Hi, after some years I updeted my multiplatform CPUID utility again
> > http://rayer.g6.cz/programm/programe.htm#CPUID
>
> Successfully tested on my ThinkPad R500 running Windows XP SP3:

People love Thinkpads, especially GNU!

> Simple CPU info utility 2.19 (C) 2001-2018 by Martin Rehak;
> rayer@hates.spam
> Compiled by GCC 6.3.0 at 03:16:16, Feb 17 2018

But DJGPP's build of 6.4.0 is from last July. (Actually, I tested 7zdec.exe with 7.3.0 and it was 100% identical to 7.2.0, so maybe I shouldn't nag.)

> CPU vendor name: GenuineIntel
> CPU name: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU P8700 @ 2.53GHz
> CPU ID: 1067A - type: 0 (primary), family: 6 (P6), model: 7, stepping: A
> CPU cores: 2, nominal speed: 2533MHz = 9.5*266MHz; L1 cache = 64kB, 8-way
> TSC measured CPU core speed: 492MHz = 6.0*82MHz; L2 cache = 3072kB, 12-way

Slightly faster than my current (old) laptop (Dell Inspiron, 2.2 Ghz), which I normally run under antiX Linux these days (via bootable USB jump drive).

Not sure what "8-way" means re: L1 cache. BTW, isn't 64kb really 32kb instruction + 32kb data?

> IA64: 0, E64MT: 1, VM Ext.: 1, FPU: 1, FMA: 0

E64MT? Perhaps you meant "EM64T"? Bah, just call it "x64".

> AVX2: 0, AVX: 0

No AVX-512? That's all the rage these days! :sleeping:

> SSE4.2: 0, SSE4.1: 1, SSSE3: 1, SSE3: 1, SSE2: 1, SSE: 1

4.1? Still better than my laptop (barely, only SSSE3).

> Safer Mode eXt.(SMX): 1

SMX? Is that related to VT-X? (Man, they've gone haywire with extensions in recent years. Apparently, I was vaguely thinking of SGX.)

EDIT: This was from memory, I didn't actually run CPUID on my laptop or desktop. Should I? They're too old and boring (relatively) to matter much here.

Rugxulo

Homepage

Usono,
22.02.2018, 02:37

@ Rugxulo

CPUID 2.19

> > Safer Mode eXt.(SMX): 1
>
> SMX? Is that related to VT-X? (Man, they've gone haywire with extensions in
> recent years. Apparently, I was vaguely thinking of SGX.)

Intel's X86: Approaching 40 and Still Going Strong (morbidly curious chart/graph of instructions and patents)

While I think patents for SSE2 are somewhat long in the tooth (2000 is roughly 17 or 18 years ago), the newer ones are probably unavoidable for quite a while.

This has come up recently:

> At Computex 2017 in May, Qualcomm and Microsoft announced plans
> to launch Snapdragon-based laptops running Windows 10, partnering
> with HP, Lenovo, and Asus to release slim portables and 2-in-1
> devices powered by the Snapdragon 835.

It's a strange world.

Back to the board
Thread view  Mix view  Order
22632 Postings in 2109 Threads, 402 registered users, 398 users online (0 registered, 398 guests)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum