rr
 
Berlin, Germany,
04.05.2008, 14:20 |
Gifsicle version 1.49 available (port) (Announce) |
On 04 May 2008 I finished my 32-bit DOS port of Eddie Kohler's Gifsicle version 1.49 using DJGPP version 2.04 beta. Binaries (gifsicle, gifdiff) and plain text manuals are available as gifs149b.zip. Fully configured sources including a GNU Diff file to be able to reverse my modifications plus some simple instructions on how to rebuild are in gifs149s.zip. ---
Forum admin |
DOS386
08.05.2008, 17:41
@ rr
|
It doesn't work |
.. ---
This is a LOGITECH mouse driver, but some software expect here
the following string:*** This is Copyright 1983 Microsoft *** |
rr
Berlin, Germany,
08.05.2008, 17:50
@ DOS386
|
It doesn't work |
> ..
That's very descriptive.  Go play with some other childs. ---
Forum admin |
DOS386
08.05.2008, 17:53
@ rr
|
It doesn't work |
> That's very descriptive.
NO. Could you please reveal what it is supposed to do, and what the system requirements are ? I don't want to blame myself with a false bug report, just to make sure that I don't expect too much  No RTFM please ... I did RTM and it indeed is F*****  ---
This is a LOGITECH mouse driver, but some software expect here
the following string:*** This is Copyright 1983 Microsoft *** |
rr
Berlin, Germany,
08.05.2008, 23:15
@ DOS386
|
It doesn't work |
> > That's very descriptive.
>
> NO. Could you please reveal what it is supposed to do, and what the system
> requirements are ? I don't want to blame myself with a false bug report,
> just to make sure that I don't expect too much No RTFM please ... I
> did RTM and it indeed is F*****
No "RTFM", but "it's all in the docs".
I'm not sure, what your problem is, so just report your bug and we'll see, if it's for real. ---
Forum admin |
Rugxulo
Usono,
09.05.2008, 04:16
@ DOS386
|
It doesn't work |
> > That's very descriptive.
>
> NO. Could you please reveal what it is supposed to do, and what the system
> requirements are ? I don't want to blame myself with a false bug report,
> just to make sure that I don't expect too much No RTFM please ... I
> did RTM and it indeed is F*****
It makes animated .GIFs, right? If your .gif samples don't work, post them online so rr can optionally check them out (although he's only the porter, not the maintainer). |
Steve
US,
09.05.2008, 07:56
@ rr
|
Gifsicle version 1.49 available (port) |
> On 04 May 2008 I finished my 32-bit DOS port
Get back to work! 1.50 source code has just been released.
- 7.May.2008
- gifsicle, gifview: Refuse to read GIFs from the terminal. Requested by Robert Riebisch. |
rr
Berlin, Germany,
13.05.2008, 10:28
@ Steve
|
Gifsicle version 1.49 available (port) |
> > On 04 May 2008 I finished my 32-bit DOS port
>
> Get back to work! 1.50 source code has just been released.
Why? 1.49 for DOS is 1.50 in fact, because I didn't know, when Eddie will have released a new version.
> - 7.May.2008
>
> - gifsicle, gifview: Refuse to read GIFs from the terminal. Requested by
> Robert Riebisch.
Yes, that's me. ---
Forum admin |
Steve
US,
13.05.2008, 10:56
@ rr
|
Gifsicle version 1.49 available (port) |
> > Get back to work! 1.50 source code has just been released.
>
> Why? 1.49 for DOS is 1.50 in fact, because I didn't know, when Eddie will
> have released a new version.
Perhaps you could now assign the later version number, to avoid confusion?
> > Requested by Robert Riebisch.
>
> Yes, that's me.
Our one-and-only! |
rr
Berlin, Germany,
13.05.2008, 11:07
@ Steve
|
Gifsicle version 1.49 available (port) |
> > Why? 1.49 for DOS is 1.50 in fact, because I didn't know, when Eddie
> will
> > have released a new version.
>
> Perhaps you could now assign the later version number, to avoid
> confusion?
At first I will look into DOS386's reports. DOS doesn't need two Gifsicle ports, I think. ---
Forum admin |
Thread view
Mix view
Order