FPC for DOS / FreeDOS (DOSX)
> > - The later 1.0.x versions were pretty decent,
>
> Better than 2.0.4? More stable??
Depends on what your focus is. Dos support and IDE support _might_ be better in 1.0.x. RTL and compiler are way more bugfree in 2.0.x, which was the first reason why the 2.0.x branch was created anyway.
The 1.0.x compiler had a little internal flaw that made maintenance painful.
> (Laaca, any comments?) That would be hard
> to believe, but I have heard rumors. So what has been the most stable DOS
> version, anyways, 1.0.10?? (Ignoring IDE and debugging but re: actual
> compiling.)
Then the recent the better compilerwise. Dos support, don't know. Laaca probably knows that better than me.
> > IMHO in all other things FPC is better. The most crucial one being that
> > FPC (and maybe GPC) are the only ones with any future at all.
>
> Yes, obviously, and that is due to being GPL.
Not really. Being open, and having some community actually developing it. License is less important.
> (But of course C/C++ is
> king, for good or bad.)
Actually VB and VB.NET are afaik still the most used development tools.
> FASM is fully written in ASM, and
> it has many users.
Well, maybe some others like to move dunes in the Sahara using a spoon, but I find that neither very interesting let alone that I want to do that myself.
Note also that an assembler is fairly simple compared to a full production level compiler.
> people still use it. It's not as impossible to understand as some people
> pretend (at least, not at the bare instruction level ... other stuff may
> be a bit more complex).
It might not be impossible too to move dunes in the sahara using spoons. However it is neither useful nor productive 
Worse, at least moving dunes is simple, yet just a lot of work. The danger with asm is that when it really grows, you'll never get it somewhat bugfree.
Where the border lies is a matter of discipline and skill. But that comes at a productivity price. Moreover assembler is no good to me if for stability reasons I still have to code according a strict regime.
Complete thread:
- HX-DOS Extender & Virtual Pascal 2.1.279 - ho1459, 14.03.2008, 14:28
![Open in board view [Board]](img/board_d.gif)
![Open in mix view [Mix]](img/mix_d.gif)
- HX-DOS Extender & Virtual Pascal 2.1.279 - Japheth, 15.03.2008, 11:26
- HX-DOS Extender & Virtual Pascal 2.1.279 - Rugxulo, 16.03.2008, 19:15
- HX-DOS Extender & Virtual Pascal 2.1.279 - ho1459, 17.03.2008, 21:07
- HX-DOS Extender & Virtual Pascal 2.1.279 - marcov, 07.04.2008, 11:45
- HX-DOS Extender & Virtual Pascal 2.1.279 - Rugxulo, 07.04.2008, 23:27
- HX-DOS Extender & Virtual Pascal 2.1.279 - marcov, 08.04.2008, 13:28
- HX-DOS Extender & Virtual Pascal 2.1.279 - Rugxulo, 08.04.2008, 15:58
- HX-DOS Extender & Virtual Pascal 2.1.279 - marcov, 10.04.2008, 10:02
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - Rugxulo, 11.04.2008, 07:14
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - marcov, 11.04.2008, 13:08
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - Rugxulo, 11.04.2008, 15:50
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - Japheth, 11.04.2008, 17:22
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - marcov, 11.04.2008, 19:50
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - Rugxulo, 12.04.2008, 00:43
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - marcov, 12.04.2008, 14:38
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - Rugxulo, 12.04.2008, 20:52
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - marcov, 13.04.2008, 23:36
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - Rugxulo, 14.04.2008, 20:40
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - marcov, 14.04.2008, 21:59
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - Rugxulo, 15.04.2008, 01:45
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - marcov, 15.04.2008, 16:11
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - Rugxulo, 16.04.2008, 02:23
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - marcov, 15.04.2008, 16:11
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - Rugxulo, 15.04.2008, 01:45
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - marcov, 14.04.2008, 21:59
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - Rugxulo, 14.04.2008, 20:40
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - marcov, 13.04.2008, 23:36
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - Rugxulo, 12.04.2008, 20:52
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - marcov, 12.04.2008, 14:38
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - Japheth, 12.04.2008, 07:33
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - marcov, 12.04.2008, 13:27
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - Japheth, 12.04.2008, 16:18
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - marcov, 13.04.2008, 02:54
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - Japheth, 13.04.2008, 09:50
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - marcov, 13.04.2008, 23:17
- Compiler debate - Steve, 14.04.2008, 05:51
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - Japheth, 14.04.2008, 08:49
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - marcov, 13.04.2008, 23:18
- Compiler debate - Steve, 14.04.2008, 06:00
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - Japheth, 14.04.2008, 08:21
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - marcov, 14.04.2008, 11:12
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - Japheth, 14.04.2008, 12:52
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - Steve, 14.04.2008, 15:05
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - marcov, 14.04.2008, 11:12
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - marcov, 13.04.2008, 23:17
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - Japheth, 13.04.2008, 09:50
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - marcov, 13.04.2008, 02:54
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - Rugxulo, 12.04.2008, 20:34
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - Japheth, 12.04.2008, 16:18
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - marcov, 12.04.2008, 13:27
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - Rugxulo, 12.04.2008, 00:43
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - Rugxulo, 11.04.2008, 15:50
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - marcov, 11.04.2008, 13:08
- FPC for DOS / FreeDOS - Rugxulo, 11.04.2008, 07:14
- HX-DOS Extender & Virtual Pascal 2.1.279 - marcov, 10.04.2008, 10:02
- HX-DOS Extender & Virtual Pascal 2.1.279 - Rugxulo, 08.04.2008, 15:58
- HX-DOS Extender & Virtual Pascal 2.1.279 - marcov, 08.04.2008, 13:28
- HX-DOS Extender & Virtual Pascal 2.1.279 - Rugxulo, 07.04.2008, 23:27
- HX-DOS Extender & Virtual Pascal 2.1.279 - ho1459, 17.03.2008, 20:56
- HX-DOS Extender & Virtual Pascal 2.1.279 - Rugxulo, 16.03.2008, 19:15
- HX-DOS Extender & Virtual Pascal 2.1.279 - Laaca, 15.03.2008, 18:56
- HX-DOS Extender & Virtual Pascal 2.1.279 - rr, 16.03.2008, 19:12
- HX-DOS Extender & Virtual Pascal 2.1.279 - Japheth, 15.03.2008, 11:26
Mix view