Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

FPC for DOS / FreeDOS (DOSX)

posted by marcov, 13.04.2008, 02:54

> I didn't talk about "embedded" and I mentioned the reason in my previous
> post. To repeat myself: the productivity advantage achieved by C compared
> to ASM is not significant if portability isn't an issue.

To repeat myself: that is not my experience.

> > the processing program (the
> > assembler/compiler) has way less information to work with (and to check
> > things) in the assembler case then in the compiler case.
>
> No.

Your lack of counter arguments is disturbing.

> > Moreover, C is known as the assembler of HLLs. So you comparing already
> to
> > rock bottom.
>
> Yes. But what's the point? Do you believe that the chain ASM -> C -> C++
> -> C# does also - quite naturally - suggest a productivity boost for each
> level?

Up to C++, yes, though not automatically. C# doesn't belong in that sequence IMHO. It is often put there for marketing, not technical reasons

 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22755 Postings in 2121 Threads, 402 registered users (0 online)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum