DOS ain't dead

HX question about link.exe (DOSX)

posted by Rugxulo , Usono, 30.07.2008, 01:19

> > What I heard was that 64-bit was 10% faster, but a lot less drivers
> work.
>
> Not my experience, though I can imagine it could be true for something
> that is really sensitive to the changes (like e.g. Photoshop).

Well, here's my wimpy experiment.

Tue Jul 29 14:58:03 UTC 2008
AMD64x2 TK-53 1.7 Ghz w/ 1 GB RAM

g++ -s -static -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer paq7asm-x86_64.o paq8o8.cpp -o paq8o8.linux64 -DDEFAULT_OPTION=1

./paq8o8.linux64 -1 doydoy1 paq8o8.cpp
Creating archive doydoy1.paq8o8 with 1 file(s)...
paq8o8.cpp 142636 ->
142636 -> 33816
Time 3.53 sec, used 37286859 bytes of memory

./paq8o8.linux64 -5 doydoy2 paq8o8.cpp
Creating archive doydoy2.paq8o8 with 1 file(s)...
paq8o8.cpp 142636 ->
142636 -> 30507
Time 21.30 sec, used 224343431 bytes of memory

paq8o8.linux64: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.8, statically linked, stripped

Linux ubuntu 2.6.24-19-generic #1 SMP Wed Jun 18 14:15:37 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux

P.S. The static binary is 743k (vs. 670k for 32-bit static). This isn't much faster at all. Oh well. (Even takes 11 secs. to compile even though the whole thing is in RAM!) And BTW, I tried to run my previous 32-bit compiles but neither seemed to work (permission denied, for whatever reason), even as root. Meh.

Complete thread:

• HX question about link.exe - mr, 26.07.2008, 13:39
  • HX question about link.exe - Japheth, 26.07.2008, 16:21
    • HX question about link.exe - mr, 26.07.2008, 19:25
      • HX question about link.exe - Japheth, 26.07.2008, 19:53
        • HX question about link.exe - mr, 26.07.2008, 20:19
    • HX question about link.exe - mr, 26.07.2008, 20:35
      • HX question about link.exe - mr, 26.07.2008, 20:47
        • HX question about link.exe - ecm, 26.07.2008, 21:24
          • HX question about link.exe - mr, 26.07.2008, 22:23
            • HX question about link.exe - ecm, 26.07.2008, 23:18
        • HX question about link.exe - Japheth, 28.07.2008, 08:16
          • HX question about link.exe - marcov, 28.07.2008, 22:48
            • HX question about link.exe - RayeR, 28.07.2008, 22:50
              • HX question about link.exe - Rugxulo, 29.07.2008, 00:11
                • HX question about link.exe - marcov, 29.07.2008, 09:33
                  • HX question about link.exe - Rugxulo, 29.07.2008, 20:42
                    • HX question about link.exe - marcov, 29.07.2008, 22:15
                      • HX question about link.exe - Rugxulo, 30.07.2008, 00:54
                        • HX question about link.exe - Steve, 30.07.2008, 05:22
                          • HX question about link.exe - marcov, 30.07.2008, 12:53
                            • HX question about link.exe - Steve, 30.07.2008, 20:07
                              • HX question about link.exe - marcov, 30.07.2008, 22:42
                                • HX question about link.exe - Steve, 31.07.2008, 05:09
                                  • HX question about link.exe - marcov, 31.07.2008, 20:45
                        • HX question about link.exe - marcov, 30.07.2008, 10:02
                      • HX question about link.exe - Rugxulo, 30.07.2008, 01:19
                    • HX question about link.exe - marcov, 29.07.2008, 22:16
                      • HX question about link.exe - Rugxulo, 30.07.2008, 01:00
                        • HX question about link.exe - marcov, 30.07.2008, 22:33
                  • HX question about link.exe - Rugxulo, 30.07.2008, 16:32
                    • HX question about link.exe - marcov, 30.07.2008, 22:57
                      • HX question about link.exe - Rugxulo, 31.07.2008, 20:12
                        • HX question about link.exe - Steve, 01.08.2008, 05:12
                          • HX question about link.exe - marcov, 01.08.2008, 12:34
                • HX question about link.exe - RayeR, 29.07.2008, 14:12