DOS ain't dead

hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll (DOSX)

posted by marcov, 02.01.2010, 21:21
(edited by marcov on 03.01.2010, 13:17)

> WIN32-programs, compiled with FPC 2.4.0 and loaded with HX are not able to
> handle dynamic libraries (dll) anymore. I tried HXRT217 and 216 with the
> same result.

I'm not entirely sure, but it might be that FPC 2.4.0 uses some -W bits here and there, and afaik now requires MSLU (on w9x. I don't know if HX emulates the -W stuff/MSLU)

> Sources and binaries are available via this link:
>
> http://postfactum.pl.ua/nebula3/download.php?q=da17c1e60708fabbd4984a7b00cd0178

Binary works fine under XP.


* added later: the stuff between parentheses.

Complete thread:

• hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - post-factum, 02.01.2010, 13:29
  • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - marcov, 02.01.2010, 21:21
    • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - post-factum, 02.01.2010, 22:11
      • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - Rugxulo, 02.01.2010, 23:23
        • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - post-factum, 03.01.2010, 11:33
          • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - Rugxulo, 03.01.2010, 15:12
            • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - post-factum, 03.01.2010, 22:46
  • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - Japheth, 04.01.2010, 10:02
    • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - post-factum, 04.01.2010, 12:01
      • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - Khusraw, 04.01.2010, 13:51
        • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - post-factum, 04.01.2010, 13:55
          • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - Khusraw, 04.01.2010, 14:25
            • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - post-factum, 04.01.2010, 14:31
              • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - Japheth, 04.01.2010, 14:42
                • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - post-factum, 04.01.2010, 15:52
                  • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - Rugxulo, 06.01.2010, 18:42