DOS ain't dead

hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll (DOSX)

posted by post-factum , /ukraine/kyiv, 04.01.2010, 14:31

> Be aware that various compilers for different programming languages have
> different definitions for TRUE (AFAIK FALSE is always 0). So it is better
> to check for 1 or -1 when it is the case, instead of TRUE. Certainly not
> your fault, but they missed it.

So to fix this, I have to recompile FPC?

---
% uname -a
Linux eternity 3.0.1-pf #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri Aug 5 21:45:05 EEST 2011 i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU T2330 @ 1.60GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux

Complete thread:

• hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - post-factum, 02.01.2010, 13:29
  • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - marcov, 02.01.2010, 21:21
    • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - post-factum, 02.01.2010, 22:11
      • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - Rugxulo, 02.01.2010, 23:23
        • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - post-factum, 03.01.2010, 11:33
          • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - Rugxulo, 03.01.2010, 15:12
            • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - post-factum, 03.01.2010, 22:46
  • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - Japheth, 04.01.2010, 10:02
    • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - post-factum, 04.01.2010, 12:01
      • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - Khusraw, 04.01.2010, 13:51
        • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - post-factum, 04.01.2010, 13:55
          • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - Khusraw, 04.01.2010, 14:25
            • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - post-factum, 04.01.2010, 14:31
              • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - Japheth, 04.01.2010, 14:42
                • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - post-factum, 04.01.2010, 15:52
                  • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - Rugxulo, 06.01.2010, 18:42