Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Search:  
Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

MSDOS 4.0 (Announce)

posted by kerravon E-mail, Ligao, Free World North, 27.04.2024, 15:53

> Also I noticed that this has things like DosWrite().
> This is basically an early incarnation of OS/2 - and
> one that looks better to me - ie it doesn't use the
> ULONG etc.
Just to expand - Microsoft *did* create a C-callable
interface to MSDOS - ie DosWrite() etc. This is apart
from anything they included in their C compiler
(write() or whatever - not sure what they provided).

And if you accept the legitimacy of the DosWrite()
call interface (used - albeit barely - by Microsoft's
own utilities), like:

v4.0/src/CMD/RESTORE/RTFILE.C

/*************************************************************/
/* write to dest file */
/*************************************************************/
retcode =
DOSWRITE
(dest_file_handle,
(char far *)&buf_pointer[0],
(unsigned) numread,
(unsigned far *) &numwrite
);

Then the definition of "32-bit MSDOS" would be:

v4.0/src/H/DOSCALLS.H

extern unsigned far pascal DOSWRITE (
unsigned,
char far *,
unsigned,
unsigned far * );

but those 16-bit unsigned parameters now naturally
morph into 32-bit (exactly what should happen for
a transition to 32-bit), and the pointers remain
as 32-bit, but obviously the "far" keyword is no
longer applicable, and they are flat pointers.

Since a recompilation is being done regardless, the
"pascal" calling convention could be dropped in
favor of cdecl.

And given the naming convention, you end up with
something similar to OS/2.

OS/2 in actuality went with:

USHORT APIENTRY DosWrite(USHORT hfile, void *ptr,
USHORT towrite, USHORT *tempWritten);

for 16-bit

and:

ULONG APIENTRY DosWrite(ULONG hfile, void *ptr,
ULONG towrite, ULONG *tempWritten);


ie the source code is not compatible.

In actuality you can simply ignore the official OS/2
documentation and use the MSDOS 4.0 definitions and
source, and it will happen to work with both 16-bit
and 32-bit OS/2.

So I would suggest that this (MSDOS 4.0) should be
adopted as the official standard to use instead of
POSIX or Windows or OS/2 (I don't like any of them
except the OS/2 function names), and provide existing
use (MSDOS 4.0, OS/2 1.x, Windows up to 2000, OS/2 2.0+).

The existing header file - doscalls.h - could be used too.

And the nature of the beast means that a thin wrapper
could be written to translate that into Win32 equivalents
so that everything from Win 95 to Win 11 is also covered.

Any thoughts?

BFN. Paul.

Post reply
 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22762 Postings in 2122 Threads, 402 registered users (0 online)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum