discussion - splitting MCBs again (Developers)
>> (hello, Bret?)
This was meant rhetoric - as an example of non BIOS int 15/4F callers - rather than a spell on you (thought you were out of this) but
>
> There are indeed many, many additional comments and observations I could,
> and maybe even should, make. But I won't.
Care to tell why ? At least I hope it's /not/ because something I wrote has you offended - if it were the case, I would call it a misunderstanding and regret, sincerely. Anyways out of the many many things you could tell (but won't) what I would find most interesting would be an answer to the question : Bret, can it happen that some one of your TSRs issue an int 15 with AX=4FF4 ? If it can, will it be spontaneous or triggered by an (which?) exterior circumstance ? And again if your program must issue the above call, and it consequently receives (from KBFR) AL=F5 and No Carry (no other modification), is it in any way spoiling your processing ?
---
Ninho
Complete thread:
- KBFR 1.9 beta discussion opened by CM - Ninho, 13.06.2011, 12:17 (Developers)
![Open in board view [Board]](img/board_d.gif)
![Open in mix view [Mix]](img/mix_d.gif)
- discussion - ecm, 13.06.2011, 14:49
- discussion - Ninho, 13.06.2011, 19:28
- discussion - splitting MCBs again - ecm, 13.06.2011, 20:20
- discussion - splitting MCBs again - Ninho, 13.06.2011, 21:52
- discussion - splitting MCBs again - bretjohn, 13.06.2011, 22:38
- discussion - splitting MCBs again - ecm, 13.06.2011, 23:41
- discussion - splitting MCBs again - bretjohn, 14.06.2011, 00:17
- discussion - splitting MCBs again - Ninho, 14.06.2011, 02:05
- discussion - splitting MCBs again - ecm, 14.06.2011, 02:10
- discussion - splitting MCBs again - Ninho, 14.06.2011, 04:09
- discussion - splitting MCBs again - bretjohn, 14.06.2011, 05:11
- on overloading and AMIS - ecm, 14.06.2011, 05:50
- discussion - splitting MCBs again - Ninho, 14.06.2011, 13:38
- discussion - splitting MCBs again - ecm, 14.06.2011, 02:10
- discussion - splitting MCBs again - ecm, 13.06.2011, 23:41
- discussion - splitting MCBs again - ecm, 13.06.2011, 23:33
- discussion - splitting MCBs again - Ninho, 14.06.2011, 01:31
- discussion - splitting MCBs again - ecm, 14.06.2011, 02:20
- discussion - splitting MCBs again - Ninho, 14.06.2011, 04:05
- discussion - splitting MCBs again - ecm, 14.06.2011, 05:54
- discussion, & "retiring" for awhile - Ninho, 14.06.2011, 12:50
- DOSLFN, intermediate handler issued calls; "retiring" - ecm, 14.06.2011, 18:51
- intermediate handler issued calls - Ninho, 15.06.2011, 15:32
- intermediate handler issued calls - ecm, 15.06.2011, 16:50
- intermediate handler issued calls - Ninho, 15.06.2011, 17:53
- intermediate handler issued calls - ecm, 15.06.2011, 22:37
- intermediate handler issued calls - Ninho, 15.06.2011, 17:53
- intermediate handler issued calls - ecm, 15.06.2011, 16:50
- intermediate handler issued calls - Ninho, 15.06.2011, 15:32
- DOSLFN, intermediate handler issued calls; "retiring" - ecm, 14.06.2011, 18:51
- discussion, & "retiring" for awhile - Ninho, 14.06.2011, 12:50
- discussion - splitting MCBs again - ecm, 14.06.2011, 05:54
- discussion - splitting MCBs again - Ninho, 14.06.2011, 04:05
- discussion - splitting MCBs again - ecm, 14.06.2011, 02:20
- discussion - splitting MCBs again - Ninho, 14.06.2011, 01:31
- discussion - splitting MCBs again - bretjohn, 13.06.2011, 22:38
- discussion - splitting MCBs again - Ninho, 13.06.2011, 21:52
- discussion - splitting MCBs again - ecm, 13.06.2011, 20:20
- discussion - Ninho, 13.06.2011, 19:28
- discussion - ecm, 13.06.2011, 14:49
Mix view