The "Title" of This Thread. (Miscellaneous)
> YES
DOS is the only OS in the universe allowing something like this
> - if you registered to a forum of BE-OS, MENU-et-OS or some other OS,
> only for the purpose to tell the other guys how crappy this BE- or
> whatever-OS is, you would get banned very quickly. But DOS is DOS
> 
Way to clip the section where I said I boot to it from a USB key. So now you're criticizing *how* I use DOS?
> Maybe sol one day will be able to exist without Internet or even
> without Oxygen - as soon as a smart brain invents a technology how to
> "emulate" those ...
"Hahaha" because not requiring junk equates to not requiring necessities?
> > I don't use Vista - and only an ignorant person would say Linux is an
> extreme CPU/memory hog.
>
> YES, it's a crucial part of my ignorance that I bothered to test
> 
The problem with ignorance, is that those who are, are usually ignorant to it. If you weren't, you'd realize Linux is just a kernel and has very minimal requirements.
One of my mail servers was running a very busy mail server and a website with 32 mb of RAM. If I felt like it, I could login and browse the web, download torrents. listen to music and whatever else I wanted while it handled thousands of e-mails a day, served PHP pages and performed backups.
Of course, you've only looked at the flashiest, major brand-new desktop-oriented distributions, not those intended for the minimalist.
If anyone actually cared to have it floppy sized these days, tomsrtbt would still be updated. Why don't you try googling that and learning something instead of arguing over things you don't understand?
Complete thread:
- Only One "Customer" -- ONLY ONE!!! - Jack, 17.10.2007, 23:39 (Miscellaneous)
![Open in board view [Board]](img/board_d.gif)
![Open in mix view [Mix]](img/mix_d.gif)
- Only One "Customer" -- ONLY ONE!!! - Steve, 18.10.2007, 08:27
- Only One "Customer" -- ONLY ONE!!! - sol, 23.10.2007, 17:41
- NO! - Jack, 23.10.2007, 21:49
- NO! - sol, 23.10.2007, 22:50
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - lucho, 24.10.2007, 13:55
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 24.10.2007, 17:43
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - lucho, 24.10.2007, 18:27
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 24.10.2007, 18:38
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - lucho, 25.10.2007, 09:16
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 25.10.2007, 17:16
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - lucho, 25.10.2007, 18:05
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 26.10.2007, 02:27
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 26.10.2007, 02:32
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 26.10.2007, 04:42
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 26.10.2007, 06:27
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 26.10.2007, 07:42
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 26.10.2007, 17:40
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 27.10.2007, 14:04
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 26.10.2007, 17:40
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - DOS386, 26.10.2007, 08:07
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 26.10.2007, 18:05
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 27.10.2007, 13:55
- 30 seconds boot time - lucho, 27.10.2007, 14:32
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 27.10.2007, 13:55
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 26.10.2007, 18:05
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 28.10.2007, 01:38
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Steve, 28.10.2007, 04:26
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 28.10.2007, 20:18
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 29.10.2007, 13:31
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 30.10.2007, 16:47
- The charm of DOS - lucho, 30.10.2007, 17:23
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 31.10.2007, 00:43
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 30.10.2007, 16:47
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 29.10.2007, 13:31
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 26.10.2007, 07:42
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 26.10.2007, 06:27
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 26.10.2007, 04:42
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - DOS386, 26.10.2007, 07:59
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 26.10.2007, 02:32
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 25.10.2007, 17:16
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - lucho, 25.10.2007, 09:16
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 24.10.2007, 18:38
- The "Title" of This Thread. - Jack, 24.10.2007, 19:36
- The "Title" of This Thread. - sol, 24.10.2007, 19:46
- Get Something ELSE!! - Jack, 24.10.2007, 22:27
- Get Something ELSE!! - sol, 24.10.2007, 23:01
- The "Title" of This Thread. - DOS386, 25.10.2007, 06:30
- The "Title" of This Thread. - rr, 25.10.2007, 10:48
- The "Title" of This Thread and the God - DOS386, 26.10.2007, 08:10
- The "Title" of This Thread. - Steve, 25.10.2007, 14:55
- The "Title" of This Thread. - rr, 25.10.2007, 10:48
- Boot floppy - lucho, 25.10.2007, 15:29
- The "Title" of This Thread. - DOS386, 28.10.2007, 02:00
- The "Title" of This Thread. - sol, 28.10.2007, 20:28
- Get Something ELSE!! - Jack, 24.10.2007, 22:27
- The "Title" of This Thread. - sol, 24.10.2007, 19:46
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - lucho, 24.10.2007, 18:27
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - RayeR, 29.10.2007, 12:35
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 30.10.2007, 16:44
- Seagate and DOS - lucho, 30.10.2007, 17:24
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 30.10.2007, 19:20
- DyDOSaurs - lucho, 30.10.2007, 20:05
- DyDOSaurs - sol, 30.10.2007, 20:10
- Questions to Solomon - lucho, 31.10.2007, 10:32
- DyDOSaurs - sol, 30.10.2007, 20:10
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 30.10.2007, 21:05
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 30.10.2007, 21:47
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 30.10.2007, 22:29
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 30.10.2007, 22:34
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 30.10.2007, 22:48
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 31.10.2007, 02:29
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 31.10.2007, 05:01
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 31.10.2007, 14:44
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 31.10.2007, 17:26
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 31.10.2007, 14:44
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 31.10.2007, 05:01
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 31.10.2007, 02:29
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 30.10.2007, 22:48
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 30.10.2007, 22:43
- Seagate and DOS - Rugxulo, 31.10.2007, 00:51
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 31.10.2007, 01:12
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 31.10.2007, 04:35
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 30.10.2007, 22:47
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 31.10.2007, 01:22
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 30.10.2007, 21:47
- DyDOSaurs - lucho, 30.10.2007, 20:05
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 30.10.2007, 19:20
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - RayeR, 31.10.2007, 12:40
- Seagate and DOS - lucho, 30.10.2007, 17:24
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 30.10.2007, 16:44
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 24.10.2007, 17:43
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - lucho, 24.10.2007, 13:55
- NO! - sol, 23.10.2007, 22:50
- NO! - Jack, 23.10.2007, 21:49
- One of the biggest improvements to DOS - lucho, 25.10.2007, 16:39
- One of the biggest improvements to DOS - Tom, 25.10.2007, 17:06
- Let's End THIS Poor-Old Thread, As Well! - Jack, 31.10.2007, 15:46
Mix view