Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

W[h]ine in Russian (Announce)

posted by DOS386, 27.03.2013, 07:01

> I asked for the code in the djgpp group thread but did not get any. He
> wrote that he was working on an old version of wine but that he did not get
> that to compile fully. I have doubts that it is possible to compile wine
> with djgpp within any reasonable investment in time.

IIRC our good old ( now dead :crying: ) King Udo boasted (cca 10 years ago) about having successfully compiled (another 10 years back) 90% of WINE with DGJPP ... so 90% from a 20 years old version of WHINE relative to today :-\

> Also, who shall run Windows applications in Wine on DOS?

me ???

> I made an alpha version of Bochs for DOS. Did not continue since I do not
> know what that should be used for.

Debugging ? Screenshooting ? Slowing down (unfortunately emulation is not that useful to speed up things) ? Anyway, official Win32 2.6 works acceptably with 6 years old HX :-\

> Author has on his page mirror of HX-DOS compatibility list originaly from DRDOS.ORG
> This original page is now gone but could be restored from winedos.ucoz.ru/HX-DOS_lists.html

WRONG. I had restored it (this page and some other pages, some still missing or outdated) cca 2 months ago:

http://www.unet.univie.ac.at/~a0503736/php/drdoswiki/index.php?n=Main.HXDOScomplists

> didn't have working binary yet and downloads was broken.
> Now I can see working download

The downloads are:

1. hard to find
2. located on crappy servers (10% chance to get them with non-DOS and Jawashit, 0% in DOS)
3. bloated, messy, and illegal (3rd party non-redistributable stuff inside)

japheth wrote:

> > Not only. There are also some MS files ( crtdll.dll, mfc*.dll )

Indeed (+ NOTEPAD, + REGEDIT, ...)

> a few dlls apparently copied from WINE and

> some obscure things from DOS386

Please explain what's obscure. YES I did find my files there :-) Maybe they can't beat WINE by features, but, at least, until someone provides a rock-solid evidence of the opposite, I'll continue ASS'ume'ing that they are, at least, 100% clean, from both technical and legal aspects :-)

> OTOH, the HX documentation files are not included.

They are ... partially ... and partially translated into Russian ... but I'm not going to approve the correctness, sorry.

---
This is a LOGITECH mouse driver, but some software expect here
the following string:*** This is Copyright 1983 Microsoft ***

 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22632 Postings in 2109 Threads, 402 registered users, 428 users online (0 registered, 428 guests)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum