Enhanced DR-DOS FAT32 corruption (Users)
Thank you glennmcc for your reply.
That being WIP is what I thought as the possible cause for the issue. Unfortunatelly stable version at level of 7.01.7, has not the later implemented read/write optimizations, and feels noticeably slower.
Regards.
> > Since I upgraded my MS-DOS 7.1 box to Enhanced DR-DOS 7.01.08 I found
> that
> > filesystems is being slowly corrupted.
> >
> > The FAT32 volume was 100% under MS-DOS, but after the switch I started
> > experiencing file not found errors and so on.
> >
> > When I ran the FAT32 enabled SCANDISK from DOS 7.1 in it, it found lots
> of
> > problems. Can see a screenshot here http://twitpic.com/d1hz5r
> >
> > Is any experiencing such corruption problems too? Is 7.01.07 stabler on
> > that sense? According to the changelog, it should not have any big
> changes
> > on the FAT32 handling.
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> I have not used it on FAT32 partitions but rather only FAT16
> therefore I can not comment on the FAT32 corruption you are seeing.
>
> However, I think this clipping from the download page says it all.
>
> ____________
> http://www.drdosprojects.de/index.cgi/download.htm
>
> Enhanced DR-DOS 7.01.08 WIP (21.7.2011)
> This is a work-in-progress version of the upcoming DR-DOS 7.01.08
> It is to be considered unstable and not ready for general use
> other than for testing and demonstration purposes.
> ____________________________________________________________________
---
Visit my personal blog at https://www.javiergutierrezchamorro.com
Complete thread:
- Enhanced DR-DOS FAT32 corruption - Guti, 08.07.2013, 11:56 (Users)
![Open in board view [Board]](img/board_d.gif)
![Open in mix view [Mix]](img/mix_d.gif)
- Enhanced DR-DOS FAT32 corruption - glennmcc, 09.07.2013, 00:24
- Enhanced DR-DOS FAT32 corruption - Guti, 09.07.2013, 08:51
- Enhanced DR-DOS FAT32 corruption - Guti, 09.07.2013, 20:12
- Enhanced DR-DOS FAT32 corruption - RayeR, 10.07.2013, 02:06
- Enhanced DR-DOS FAT32 corruption - Guti, 10.07.2013, 19:42
- EDR-DOS FAT28 corruption (most likely NOT due to EDR-DOS) - DOS386, 09.08.2013, 10:53
- EDR-DOS FAT28 corruption (most likely NOT due to EDR-DOS) - Guti, 08.09.2013, 08:52
- EDR-DOS FAT28 corruption (most likely NOT due to EDR-DOS) - Rugxulo, 08.09.2013, 17:53
- EDR-DOS FAT28 corruption (most likely NOT due to EDR-DOS) - Guti, 09.09.2013, 08:18
- EDR-DOS FAT28 corruption (most likely NOT due to EDR-DOS) - DOS386, 11.09.2013, 04:41
- EDR-DOS FAT28 corruption (most likely NOT due to EDR-DOS) - glennmcc, 11.09.2013, 17:07
- EDR-DOS FAT28 corruption (most likely NOT due to EDR-DOS) - Guti, 27.09.2013, 13:10
- EDR-DOS FAT28 corruption (most likely NOT due to EDR-DOS) - DOS386, 11.09.2013, 04:41
- EDR-DOS FAT28 corruption (most likely NOT due to EDR-DOS) - Guti, 09.09.2013, 08:18
- EDR-DOS FAT28 corruption (most likely NOT due to EDR-DOS) - Rugxulo, 08.09.2013, 17:53
- EDR-DOS FAT28 corruption (most likely NOT due to EDR-DOS) - Guti, 08.09.2013, 08:52
- EDR-DOS FAT28 corruption (most likely NOT due to EDR-DOS) - DOS386, 09.08.2013, 10:53
- Enhanced DR-DOS FAT32 corruption - Guti, 10.07.2013, 19:42
- Enhanced DR-DOS FAT32 corruption - RayeR, 10.07.2013, 02:06
- Enhanced DR-DOS FAT32 corruption - Guti, 09.07.2013, 20:12
- Enhanced DR-DOS FAT32 corruption - Guti, 09.07.2013, 08:51
- Enhanced DR-DOS FAT32 corruption - glennmcc, 09.07.2013, 00:24
Mix view