DOS ain't dead

BSD alternatives to coreutils (Developers)

posted by lmemsm , 23.01.2014, 23:25

> So basically you want to create a POSIX compatibillity layer on top of the
> DOS?

Not really what I'm working towards. If I wanted that, there's a musl port to Windows which will give a POSIX compatibility layer. I could just use it. From what I've read about it, it may be much better than the Cygwin alternative.

I think Georg, Oso2K and Ibidem got the idea of what I'm trying to accomplish. So, if anyone's interested in discussing it further, feel free to e-mail me. Was just curious if anyone was already working along those lines or was interested in projects of that nature.

Complete thread:

• BSD alternatives to coreutils - lmemsm, 19.01.2014, 17:32 (Developers)
  • BSD alternatives to coreutils - RayeR, 19.01.2014, 17:40
  • BSD alternatives to coreutils - Doug, 19.01.2014, 21:42
    • BSD alternatives to coreutils - lmemsm, 20.01.2014, 13:24
  • BSD alternatives to coreutils - bocke, 20.01.2014, 15:04
    • BSD alternatives to coreutils - bocke, 20.01.2014, 16:41
    • BSD alternatives to coreutils - lmemsm, 21.01.2014, 13:59
      • BSD alternatives to coreutils - marcov, 21.01.2014, 15:30
        • BSD alternatives to coreutils - Oso2k, 21.01.2014, 23:01
          • BSD alternatives to coreutils - Ibidem, 22.01.2014, 04:05
        • BSD alternatives to coreutils - bocke, 22.01.2014, 21:26
      • BSD alternatives to coreutils - georgpotthast, 22.01.2014, 08:18
        • BSD alternatives to coreutils - lmemsm, 22.01.2014, 14:33
        • BSD alternatives to coreutils - marcov, 23.01.2014, 21:33
      • BSD alternatives to coreutils - bocke, 22.01.2014, 21:45
        • BSD alternatives to coreutils - lmemsm, 23.01.2014, 23:25
          • BSD alternatives to coreutils - Oso2k, 24.01.2014, 01:28
          • BSD alternatives to coreutils - bocke, 14.02.2014, 02:59