DOjS Javascript for DOS went 1.0 (Announce)
> > no, sorry, that is not how this works.
> > JavaScript is just the language I used. It has nothing to do with
> HTTP/HTML
> > in this case.
> > You can't just plug something like a HTML4/5 JS runtime into an existing
> > browser.
>
> It will be very useful for a DOS browser like LINKS and JavaScript runtime
> like DOjS to work together though, because the main use of JavaScript is
> for Internet (in combination with HTML) after all. Your work on DOjS itself
> is impressive, but perhaps you or someone else can port the code from DOjS
> to LINKS to make DOS Internet work with JavaScript too, so that your work
> will become useful to a wider range of DOS users.
Links2 on DOS integration/support would be awesome! Have you considered Nano-X/Microwindows support?
Complete thread:
- DOjS Javascript for DOS went 1.0 - SuperIlu, 27.03.2020, 14:47 (Announce)
- DOjS Javascript for DOS went 1.0 - iw2evk, 28.03.2020, 15:51
- DOjS Javascript for DOS went 1.0 - SuperIlu, 28.03.2020, 17:42
- DOjS Javascript for DOS went 1.0 - Wengier, 31.03.2020, 02:59
- DOjS Javascript for DOS went 1.0 - Oso2k, 31.03.2020, 09:00
- DOjS Javascript for DOS went 1.0 - glennmcc, 31.03.2020, 19:23
- DOjS Javascript for DOS went 1.0 - Wengier, 31.03.2020, 21:49
- DOjS Javascript for DOS went 1.0 - iw2evk, 06.04.2020, 14:34
- DOjS Javascript for DOS went 1.0 - Wengier, 31.03.2020, 21:49
- DOjS Javascript for DOS went 1.0 - glennmcc, 06.04.2020, 23:37
- DOjS Javascript for DOS went 1.0 - SuperIlu, 07.04.2020, 20:51
- DOjS Javascript for DOS went 1.0 - Wengier, 31.03.2020, 02:59
- DOjS Javascript for DOS went 1.0 - SuperIlu, 28.03.2020, 17:42
- DOjS Javascript for DOS went 1.0 - iw2evk, 28.03.2020, 15:51