Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

PDOS-generic (Announce)

posted by kerravon E-mail, Ligao, Free World North, 14.11.2021, 09:01

> > Regardless, no, I was talking about ISO/IEC 9899:1990
> > aka C90.
>
> Never saw anything special about it. Probably nice for *nixers who had to
> specify their applications in C source at that time, but for the rest
> fairly irrelevant.

It provided a universal language for computers.

> Like most languages standards, too deliberately terse on the library front
> IMHO.

I've been using it for the 30+ years it has existed,
and I can't see anything wrong with it.

> > The wrapper I showed you did an INT 21H. I don't
> > know what alternative you could possibly be
> > suggesting.
>
> The point that is if the wrapper had been 32-bit callable and in the OS,
> then as time progressed successors and emulators could have hooked it.

I don't know what "hooking" you are talking about,
and what relevance emulators are, but the wrapper
I provided is 32-bit callable, and in both PDOS/386
and PDOS-generic.

Microsoft has abandoned MSDOS, so some other stream
needs to take its place, e.g. Freedos.

Do you have a specific proposal that could be added
to Freedos so that a suitable wrapper is both 32-bit
callable and in the OS as you requested?

Or alternatively, that is still thunked, in Freedos,
in 2021, but on PDOS/386 or PDOS-generic, is run
entirely as 32-bit, which is useful once you have
migrated (by 2021) all of your 16-bit apps to 32-bit.

BFN. Paul.

 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22632 Postings in 2109 Threads, 402 registered users, 454 users online (0 registered, 454 guests)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum