readexe version 0.1 (Announce)
Hello segin,
I do not know — if you do not actually care about honoring C language standards, maybe do not bring them up on the first place?
OK, I grant that you have very strong opinions on how to write code. But then again, a lot of people also have very strong (and different) opinions (myself included). It will help if you provide us a good reason to pay particular attention to your opinions.
Last but not least: bit-fields already existed in C89.
Thank you!
---
https://gitlab.com/tkchia · https://codeberg.org/tkchia · 😴 "MOV AX,0D500H+CMOS_REG_D+NMI"
Complete thread:
- readexe version 0.1 - segin, 08.08.2023, 18:08 (Announce)
- readexe version 0.1 - DosWorld, 09.08.2023, 23:30
- readexe version 0.1 - segin, 11.08.2023, 12:49
- readexe version 0.1 - tkchia, 10.08.2023, 21:08
- readexe version 0.1 - segin, 11.08.2023, 12:46
- readexe version 0.1 - tkchia, 11.08.2023, 12:59
- readexe version 0.1 - segin, 11.08.2023, 13:50
- readexe version 0.1 - tkchia, 11.08.2023, 12:59
- readexe version 0.1 - segin, 11.08.2023, 12:46
- readexe version 0.1 - RayeR, 15.08.2023, 19:01
- readexe version 0.1 - segin, 15.08.2023, 19:53
- readexe version 0.1 - segin, 22.08.2023, 00:49
- readexe version 0.1 - Oso2k, 22.08.2023, 08:11
- readexe version 0.1 - Rugxulo, 22.08.2023, 15:51
- readexe version 0.1 - segin, 15.08.2023, 19:53
- readexe version 0.1 - DosWorld, 09.08.2023, 23:30