DOS ain't dead

Alternative for M$ CP/M assembler M80 & L80 for DOS/Win32? (Users)

posted by RayeR , CZ, 04.12.2024, 20:06
(edited by RayeR on 04.12.2024, 23:10)

> Well, I compiled the NTVCM. It required updating my OpenWatcom toolchain.
> Also my mingw64/g++-8.1.0 seems to be too old to know advanced c++
> features...

Hm, even with latest mingw I'm unable to compile NTVCM for windows.


gcc version 14.2.0 (i686-win32-dwarf-rev0, Built by MinGW-Builds project)
C:\NTVCM>mg.bat
In file included from ntvcm.cxx:44:
./djltrace.hxx: In member function 'void CDJLTrace::Trace(const char*, ...)':
./djltrace.hxx:220:41: error: '_getpid' was not declared in this scope; did you mean '_getcwd'?
  220 |                              (unsigned) _getpid() );
                              _getcwd


Well, I fixed it by adding
#ifdef _WIN32
#include <process.h>
#endif

to both .cxx files. Now I have also win32 NTVCM binary. So I step further to compile the monitor source. It complains about:
Origin below loader memory, move anyway(Y or N)?n
I chose n and got some intel HEX file. So I'll see if it works...


C:\NTVCM\CPMTOOLS>..\NTVCM.EXE M80 =MON40F.MAC/N

No Fatal error(s)

C:\NTVCM\CPMTOOLS>..\NTVCM.EXE L80 MON40F/P:0/D:4000,MON40F/N/X/Y/E

Link-80  3.44  09-Dec-81  Copyright (c) 1981 Microsoft

Data    4000    4000    <    0>
Program 0000    4400    <17408>

36656 Bytes Free
[0000   4000       67]
Origin below loader memory, move anyway(Y or N)?n

C:\DATA\____SAPI\NTVCM\CPMTOOLS>dir MON4*
04.12.2024  22:47            41 984 MON40F.HEX
04.12.2024  20:58            38 021 MON40F.MAC
04.12.2024  22:47             2 560 MON40F.REL
04.12.2024  22:47               128 MON40F.SYM
               4 File(s)         82 693 bytes


---
DOS gives me freedom to unlimited HW access.

Complete thread:

• Alternative for M$ CP/M assembler M80 & L80 for DOS/Win32? - RayeR, 02.12.2024, 17:48 (Users)
  • Alternative for M$ CP/M assembler M80 & L80 for DOS/Win32? - DosWorld, 02.12.2024, 20:52
    • Alternative for M$ CP/M assembler M80 & L80 for DOS/Win32? - RayeR, 03.12.2024, 00:04
      • Alternative for M$ CP/M assembler M80 & L80 for DOS/Win32? - Rugxulo, 03.12.2024, 05:42
        • Alternative for M$ CP/M assembler M80 & L80 for DOS/Win32? - Rugxulo, 03.12.2024, 08:09
          • Alternative for M$ CP/M assembler M80 & L80 for DOS/Win32? - DosWorld, 03.12.2024, 11:09
            • Alternative for M$ CP/M assembler M80 & L80 for DOS/Win32? - Rugxulo, 06.12.2024, 05:43
        • Alternative for M$ CP/M assembler M80 & L80 for DOS/Win32? - RayeR, 03.12.2024, 16:54
          • Alternative for M$ CP/M assembler M80 & L80 for DOS/Win32? - Ruud, 03.12.2024, 19:43
            • Alternative for M$ CP/M assembler M80 & L80 for DOS/Win32? - RayeR, 04.12.2024, 04:11
          • Alternative for M$ CP/M assembler M80 & L80 for DOS/Win32? - RayeR, 04.12.2024, 06:20
            • Alternative for M$ CP/M assembler M80 & L80 for DOS/Win32? - RayeR, 04.12.2024, 20:06
              • Alternative for M$ CP/M assembler M80 & L80 for DOS/Win32? - Rugxulo, 05.12.2024, 04:52
                • Alternative for M$ CP/M assembler M80 & L80 for DOS/Win32? - RayeR, 05.12.2024, 08:01
        • Alternative for M$ CP/M assembler M80 & L80 for DOS/Win32? - roytam, 06.12.2024, 07:25
          • Alternative for M$ CP/M assembler M80 & L80 for DOS/Win32? - RayeR, 07.12.2024, 08:54
        • Alternative for CP/M assembler M80&L80 for DOS/Win32-solved - RayeR, 09.12.2024, 01:30
          • Alternative for CP/M assembler M80&L80 for DOS/Win32-solved - DosWorld, 10.12.2024, 18:42
            • Alternative for CP/M assembler M80&L80 for DOS/Win32-solved - RayeR, 13.12.2024, 01:52