DOS ain't dead

Got it: >>> DOS For(ever)um <<< (Miscellaneous)

posted by Japheth , Germany (South), 19.12.2007, 02:58

> I took this one now. Still have to adjust posting #1 accordingly.

IMO "DOS for(ever)um" is "too intellectual". Why not just "DOS Forum" or "The DOS Forum"?

---
MS-DOS forever!

Complete thread:

• Important! Call for better name for this forum - rr, 10.12.2007, 12:34 (Miscellaneous)
  • Important! Call for better name for this forum - iw2evk, 10.12.2007, 13:22
    • Important! Call for better name for this forum - jaybur, 10.12.2007, 16:32
  • Important! Call for better name for this forum - Steve, 10.12.2007, 13:39
  • Important! Call for better name for this forum - Rugxulo, 10.12.2007, 23:52
    • Important! Call for better name for this forum - rr, 11.12.2007, 10:25
  • Important! Call for better name for this forum - Japheth, 11.12.2007, 11:34
    • Important! Call for better name for this forum - rr, 11.12.2007, 11:47
      • Important! Call for better name for this forum - Japheth, 11.12.2007, 12:14
        • Important! Call for better name for this forum - rr, 11.12.2007, 13:17
  • Important! Call for better name for this forum - jaybur, 11.12.2007, 12:16
    • Important! Call for better name for this forum - rr, 11.12.2007, 13:19
      • Important! Call for better name for this forum - jaybur, 11.12.2007, 13:41
        • Important! Call for better name for this forum - Rugxulo, 11.12.2007, 18:23
          • Important! Call for better name for this forum - Rugxulo, 11.12.2007, 18:48
        • Important! Call for better name for this forum - Rugxulo, 14.12.2007, 08:43
          • Important! Call for better name for this forum - jaybur, 14.12.2007, 13:10
            • Important! Call for better name for this forum - Rugxulo, 14.12.2007, 19:12
              • Important! Call for better name for this forum - jaybur, 14.12.2007, 22:25
                • Important! Call for better name for this forum - DOS386, 15.12.2007, 18:08
  • Important! Call for better name for this forum - DOS386, 12.12.2007, 01:20
    • Important! Call for better name for this forum - Rugxulo, 12.12.2007, 18:14
      • Got it: >>> DOS For(ever)um <<< - DOS386, 14.12.2007, 05:49
        • Got it: >>> DOS For(ever)um <<< - rr, 17.12.2007, 13:32
          • Got it: >>> DOS For(ever)um <<< - flox, 17.12.2007, 16:10
          • Got it: >>> DOS For(ever)um <<< - Japheth, 19.12.2007, 02:58
            • Got it: >>> DOS For(ever)um <<< - rr, 20.12.2007, 17:31