TripleFault HDPMI32 | CuteMouse is INNOCENT (exceptionally) (DOSX)
> But that's YOUR typical style ...
OH well
> A crash in a real-mode callback (RMCB) is always somewhat dangerous,
> because the InDOS flag might be set, making a proper termination "impossible".
Thanks.
> However, the most stupid contributor to the unrecoverable crash possibly
> is a "known" bug in CuteMouse.
Did you or anyone else write about it before ? I was not aware of it (OTOH that no version of CT or any other mouse driver is 100% bugfree, YES).
> It doesn't "allow" an application to crash inside a mouse event proc.
There was trouble with HX, Blocek, GVFM, ...
> Did you also test without/another mouse driver?
Good idea , results:
HDPMI32, no mouse driver: still TripleFault
CWSDPMI, no mouse driver: hey, seems to start and work ... just the mouse doesn't for unknown reason
CWSDPMI, LOGITECH driver 6.50: The very same PF in RMCB
Are RCMB's used in TEXT based mouse controlled apps at all ? I don't see any in INFOPAD's source
> For example the very good one from Microsoft?
I would rather eat a rat than use a >100 KiB rat driver from M$
---
This is a LOGITECH mouse driver, but some software expect here
the following string:*** This is Copyright 1983 Microsoft ***
Complete thread:
- [BUG] ESP=0 | push | TripleFault | BOOM! | inside HDPMI32 ? - DOS386, 10.01.2008, 01:51 (DOSX)
- What about CuteMouse? - Japheth, 10.01.2008, 07:01
- TripleFault HDPMI32 | CuteMouse is INNOCENT (exceptionally) - DOS386, 12.01.2008, 02:38
- TripleFault HDPMI32 | CuteMouse is INNOCENT (exceptionally) - jaybur, 12.01.2008, 07:59
- No (Cute)Mouse problem, No "raw" mode problem - Japheth, 13.01.2008, 08:51
- SET HDPMI=1 should help - Japheth, 14.01.2008, 03:26
- bug in ??? fixed ??? - DOS386, 14.01.2008, 10:18
- HDPMI=1 did help Ladsoft also | DOS/32A is "paranoid" :-( - DOS386, 14.01.2008, 11:06
- SET HDPMI=1 should help - Japheth, 14.01.2008, 03:26
- TripleFault HDPMI32 | CuteMouse is INNOCENT (exceptionally) - DOS386, 12.01.2008, 02:38
- What about CuteMouse? - Japheth, 10.01.2008, 07:01