Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

Good PC's needed (80386, 8086, 4004 :-D) report what you h (Developers)

posted by marcov, 02.05.2008, 23:17

> > Not disabled, but defective. Intel's method was to have one production
> > line, then test chips. Good FPU > sell as DX. Bad FPU > sell as SX.
> > Similarly with speed - run chip at increasing frequencies, then label
> > according to where errors begin.
>
> Do you think they had as many defective CPUs as they sold SX processors? I
> think that math coprocessor itself takes only small surface of silicon die,
> sure much smaller than cache.

(the cache wasn't that big in those days. 8k or so, except later stepping DX4's that had 16k).

But both are right as far as I know. In the beginning they were a way to create a market the partially broken ones (just like the first Celeron's were P-II's with defective cache). But when yields go up, a special line (mendocinno in Celeron's case), or "good" CPUs are marked as the inferior product.

 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22747 Postings in 2119 Threads, 402 registered users, 128 users online (0 registered, 128 guests)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum