DOS ain't dead

test report (Announce)

posted by rr  , Berlin, Germany, 13.05.2008, 21:38

> > I noticed that too and I have a clue of what's the cause, but DOS386's
> > port is really a very badly designed hack, so I won't help.
>
> Sounds not very reasonable to me. Do you only consider to help if things
> are already perfect?

No, but I don't want to waste my time digging a rubbish dump, if I already have a much cleaner way here.

> Yes, but his port is made with nice, good and exciting OW, while yours
> uses bloated, boring and buggy DGPJJ.

That's very reasonable, of course. So just ignore my port.

---
Forum admin

Complete thread:

• GIFSICLE 1.50K uploaded DOS (+Win32) port really works now - DOS386, 09.05.2008, 06:57 (Announce)
  • GIFSICLE 1.50K uploaded DOS (+Win32) port really works now - DOS386, 09.05.2008, 07:07
    • GIFSICLE 1.50K uploaded DOS (+Win32) port really works now - DOS386, 09.05.2008, 08:02
      • GIFSICLE 1.50K - Rugxulo, 09.05.2008, 14:57
        • GIFSICLE 1.50K - Steve, 09.05.2008, 17:02
    • test report - Japheth, 13.05.2008, 15:12
      • test report - rr, 13.05.2008, 17:00
        • test report - Japheth, 13.05.2008, 18:23
          • test report - rr, 13.05.2008, 21:38
            • test report - Japheth, 13.05.2008, 21:55
          • test report - Rugxulo, 13.05.2008, 22:25
            • test report - Japheth, 13.05.2008, 23:06
              • test report - Rugxulo, 14.05.2008, 00:39
                • test report - Japheth, 14.05.2008, 08:34
                  • test report - marcov, 14.05.2008, 10:04
                    • test report - Japheth, 14.05.2008, 11:46
                      • test report - marcov, 14.05.2008, 11:56
      • BUG - DOS386, 31.05.2008, 01:56
        • BUG - Japheth, 31.05.2008, 07:49