No PIC (Announce)
> > 2) what is it good for?
>
> Avoiding segmentation and fixups, using shared libs / objects / drivers (
> YES - DOS needs reusable 32-bit PIC drivers )
For what? IMO absolutely useless for DOS.
> Reserve one register ( EBX ? or FP will decide for you ?) for global base,
> and index all global vars with it.
Yes, but that's bullshit. PIC might be somewhat useful for Unix, for DOS and Windows it's useless, for ASM it's big CRAP.
---
MS-DOS forever!
Complete thread:
- Free Pascal version 2.2.2 release candidate 1 available - marcov, 17.06.2008, 12:24 (Announce)
- Free Pascal version 2.2.2 release candidate 1 available - Laaca, 19.06.2008, 00:33
- Free Pascal version 2.2.2 release candidate 1 available - DOS386, 19.06.2008, 08:27
- Free Pascal version 2.2.2 release candidate 1 available - marcov, 19.06.2008, 11:15
- Free Pascal version 2.2.2 release candidate 1 available - marcov, 19.06.2008, 11:28
- Free Pascal version 2.2.2 release candidate 1 available - Laaca, 19.06.2008, 21:56
- Free Pascal version 2.2.2 release candidate 1 available - marcov, 21.06.2008, 15:32
- Free Pascal version 2.2.2 release candidate 1 available - Laaca, 19.06.2008, 21:56
- Free Pascal version 2.2.2 release candidate 1 available - Laaca, 19.06.2008, 22:14
- PIC - DOS386, 20.06.2008, 09:23
- No PIC - Japheth, 20.06.2008, 20:22
- No PIC - marcov, 21.06.2008, 14:00
- No PIC | bullshit | CRAP - DOS386, 20.08.2008, 08:10
- No PIC | bullshit | CRAP - Japheth, 20.08.2008, 10:24
- PIC - marcov, 21.06.2008, 13:54
- No PIC - Japheth, 20.06.2008, 20:22
- PIC - DOS386, 20.06.2008, 09:23
- Free Pascal version 2.2.2 release candidate 1 available - Laaca, 19.06.2008, 00:33