DOS ain't dead

[Some links ...] - "tiny" data loss - very sad :-( (DOSX)

posted by rr  , Berlin, Germany, 23.07.2007, 09:16

> Including a kick-out of all existing posts

Yes. I already explained.

> This is sad ... there were 500 useful DOS related posts providing
> good evidence that DOS is NOT dead and DOS Extenders are not
> "obsolete" ...

True, but whining doesn't bring them back.

> OTOH they are available in Gooooogle's cache ... so if someone wants to
> recover some posts ... but hurry up ...

I see, you already did. Thanks!

> At this sad occasion I'll start to post as "DOS386" instead of
> "NTOSKRNL_VXE"

Maybe you want to become a registered user now? Just drop me a message with a valid email address.

---
Forum admin

Complete thread:

• Some links ... - Japheth, 18.07.2007, 17:23 (DOSX)
  • Some links ... - Rugxulo, 18.07.2007, 22:50
    • Some links ... - Rugxulo, 19.07.2007, 04:44
      • Some links ... - Japheth, 19.07.2007, 10:16
        • Some links ... - Rugxulo, 19.07.2007, 20:54
          • Some links ... - rr, 19.07.2007, 21:07
        • Some links ... - Rugxulo, 20.07.2007, 03:38
          • Some links ... - Japheth, 20.07.2007, 09:10
            • Some links ... - Rugxulo, 21.07.2007, 22:06
              • Some links ... - Japheth, 22.07.2007, 08:37
              • Some links ... - Japheth, 23.07.2007, 09:11
    • Some links ... - Japheth, 19.07.2007, 07:03
    • Some links ... - rr, 19.07.2007, 09:54
      • Some links ... - Rugxulo, 19.07.2007, 20:53
        • Some links ... - rr, 19.07.2007, 21:08
  • [Some links ...] - "tiny" data loss - very sad :-( - DOS386, 23.07.2007, 02:22
    • [Some links ...] - "tiny" data loss - very sad :-( - rr, 23.07.2007, 09:16
    • [Some links ...] - "tiny" data loss - very sad :-( - Japheth, 23.07.2007, 10:53
      • [Some links ...] - "tiny" data loss - very sad :-( - rr, 23.07.2007, 11:00