DOS ain't dead - x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0

x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 (Developers)

posted by rr , Berlin, Germany, 30.11.2008, 22:38

> Being so limited in RAM really hampers what you can run on it. I could
> live with 8086 (although most common stuff requires 386+), but the low RAM
> kills a lot of apps. Even with srcs, I'm not talented enough to hack
> everything to fit in such a cramped space.

The Pofo hasn't been made for image processing. ;-)

> > A netbook like the Acer Aspire One is only "slightly" larger, but a
> real
> > PC. ;-)
>
> Smaller screen (something like 8") and keyboard as well as no optical
> drive, so these "netbooks" weigh typically 2.5 lbs or so (vs. my current
> laptop's 6.5 lbs). And speaking of crappy battery life, 6 cell gives me
> max. 2 hrs on this laptop (and that's on "Power Saver", meh). Oh well.

I've used the Aspire 150X for surfing the net for half an hour on Saturday and it worked very well. Good performance, no noise, clear and bright display, acceptable keyboard.

> guess. But I don't majorly need it.) There are really good laptops (12 hrs
> for some high-end Toshiba), but they are much more expensive.

Last Toshiba I saw (Portégé R500), was rather expensive, but very crappy. Please, no Toshi for me again!

---
Forum admin

Post reply

Complete thread:

x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - mht, 22.11.2008, 15:15 (Developers)
- x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - Rugxulo, 25.11.2008, 06:47
  - x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - ecm, 25.11.2008, 13:31
    - x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - mht, 25.11.2008, 22:11
  - x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - rr, 25.11.2008, 21:21
    - x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - mht, 25.11.2008, 21:59
      - x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - rr, 25.11.2008, 22:10
        x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - mht, 28.11.2008, 07:17
        x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - mht, 05.12.2008, 08:55
    - x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - RayeR, 25.11.2008, 22:22
      - x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - rr, 26.11.2008, 20:57
        x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - Rugxulo, 28.11.2008, 00:09
        x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - marcov, 28.11.2008, 15:41
        x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - rr, 30.11.2008, 18:33
        x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - Rugxulo, 30.11.2008, 20:53
        portable handhelds' battery life - Rugxulo, 30.11.2008, 21:06
        x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - rr, 30.11.2008, 22:38
        x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - RayeR, 30.11.2008, 22:41