DOS ain't dead

MMX moves (Developers)

posted by FFK , 18.02.2009, 09:44

> That's probably true, but in reality the effect will be somewhere between
> "zero" and "virtually zero".

In practice it's very dependent on CPU, FSB, destination and source RAM.
But theorically with this code we are saving about 3 CPU cycles for each copy. And I think that 3 CPU cycles are not "zero" or "virtually zero"
Any way we can test and see what happen.

Complete thread:

• MMX moves - Laaca, 16.02.2009, 21:20 (Developers)
  • MMX moves - rr, 16.02.2009, 21:34
  • MMX moves - Japheth, 16.02.2009, 22:05
    • MMX moves - rr, 16.02.2009, 22:11
      • MMX moves - Japheth, 17.02.2009, 13:52
        • MMX moves - Laaca, 17.02.2009, 16:29
          • MMX moves - Japheth, 17.02.2009, 17:16
            • MMX moves - Laaca, 17.02.2009, 18:56
      • MMX moves - marcov, 18.02.2009, 09:55
  • MMX moves - FFK, 16.02.2009, 23:04
  • MMX moves - Rugxulo, 17.02.2009, 00:54
  • MMX moves - FFK, 17.02.2009, 21:37
    • MMX moves - Rugxulo, 18.02.2009, 00:48
    • MMX moves - Japheth, 18.02.2009, 09:08
      • MMX moves - FFK, 18.02.2009, 09:44