Board view
Mix viewThis TSR is impossible to beat !!! 116/48/32/0 Bytes ARF pr (Announce)
posted by Khusraw 
, Bucharest, Romania, 27.03.2009, 08:29
(edited by Khusraw on 27.03.2009, 08:40)
Personally I don't use JEMM386, but I think there are situations where JLMs could be useful and have their advantage over TSRs. For example I expect Japheth in his infinite wisdom to write a JLM providing Sound Blaster emulation for AC97 and/or Intel HDA. These very poor, "on-board", sound cards are commonly used now, as there are places in the world where you couldn't find a mainboard without having them integrated.
---
Glory to God for all things
Complete thread:
- This TSR is impossible to beat !!! 116/48/32/0 Bytes ARF pr - DOS386, 22.03.2009, 04:56 (Announce)
![[Board]](img/board_d.gif "Open in board view")
![[Mix]](img/mix_d.gif "Open in mix view")
- This TSR is impossible to beat !!! 116/48/32/0 Bytes ARF pr - Laaca, 22.03.2009, 09:11
- This TSR is impossible to beat !!! 116/48/32/0 Bytes ARF pr - ecm, 22.03.2009, 11:36
- This TSR is impossible to beat !!! 116/48/32/0 Bytes ARF pr - mr, 22.03.2009, 20:05
- This TSR is impossible to beat !!! 116/48/32/0 Bytes ARF pr - ecm, 22.03.2009, 21:57
- This TSR is impossible to beat !!! 116/48/32/0 Bytes ARF pr - mr, 25.03.2009, 19:01
- This TSR is impossible to beat !!! 116/48/32/0 Bytes ARF pr - ecm, 25.03.2009, 19:10
- This TSR is impossible to beat !!! 116/48/32/0 Bytes ARF pr - mr, 25.03.2009, 20:09
- This TSR is impossible to beat !!! 116/48/32/0 Bytes ARF pr - ecm, 26.03.2009, 20:43
- This TSR is impossible to beat !!! 116/48/32/0 Bytes ARF pr - Khusraw, 27.03.2009, 08:29
- This TSR is impossible to beat !!! 116/48/32/0 Bytes ARF pr - RayeR, 28.03.2009, 03:17
- This TSR is impossible to beat !!! 116/48/32/0 Bytes ARF pr - Khusraw, 27.03.2009, 08:29
- This TSR is impossible to beat !!! 116/48/32/0 Bytes ARF pr - ecm, 26.03.2009, 20:43
- This TSR is impossible to beat !!! 116/48/32/0 Bytes ARF pr - mr, 25.03.2009, 20:09
- This TSR is impossible to beat !!! 116/48/32/0 Bytes ARF pr - Khusraw, 25.03.2009, 22:08
- This TSR is impossible to beat !!! 116/48/32/0 Bytes ARF pr - ecm, 25.03.2009, 19:10
- This TSR is impossible to beat !!! 116/48/32/0 Bytes ARF pr - mr, 25.03.2009, 19:01
- This TSR is impossible to beat !!! 116/48/32/0 Bytes ARF pr - ecm, 22.03.2009, 21:57
- This TSR is impossible to beat !!! 116/48/32/0 Bytes ARF pr - rr, 22.03.2009, 21:53
- Impossible to beat? This version needs 0/0/0/0 Bytes - Japheth, 27.03.2009, 09:23
- Impossible to beat? This version needs 0/0/0/0 Bytes - ecm, 27.03.2009, 15:12
- Impossible to beat? This version needs 0/0/0/0 Bytes - Rugxulo, 27.03.2009, 17:12
- This version needs 0/0/0/0 Bytes - but not on EDR-DOS - DOS386, 31.03.2009, 04:03
- Yes - Japheth, 31.03.2009, 10:53
- This version needs 0/0/0/0 Bytes - but not on EDR-DOS - ecm, 31.03.2009, 23:10
- This version needs 0/0/0/0 Bytes - but not on EDR-DOS - DOS386, 05.04.2009, 04:21
- This version needs 0/0/0/0 Bytes - but not on EDR-DOS - ecm, 05.04.2009, 09:27
- This version needs 0/0/0/0 Bytes - but not on EDR-DOS - DOS386, 07.04.2009, 05:05
- This version needs 0/0/0/0 Bytes - but not on EDR-DOS - ecm, 07.04.2009, 13:34
- This version needs 0/0/0/0 Bytes - but not on EDR-DOS - DOS386, 07.04.2009, 05:05
- This version needs 0/0/0/0 Bytes - but not on EDR-DOS - ecm, 05.04.2009, 09:27
- This version needs 0/0/0/0 Bytes - but not on EDR-DOS - DOS386, 05.04.2009, 04:21
- This TSR is impossible to beat !!! 116/48/32/0 Bytes ARF pr - Arjay, 11.12.2009, 12:21
