Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

EDR-DOS WIP 2009-03-28 released | many BUG's (Users)

posted by DOS386, 13.04.2009, 09:37

> Inside the distributed patch or binary ZIP files. Ever downloaded them?

Oops ... sorry, boasting with test results, but forgot to download the stuff before :confused:

> I still don't understand what you mean by "Renaming a file in a
> subdirectory switches to main". Did you delete dot and dotdot

YES, using Wde.

> and then renaming a file in a subdirectory (using 21.56)

Using REN

> switches back to the root in EDR-DOS?

YES, a strong sign that EDR-DOS does use the dot's :clap:

> There's good old SFN software

OK.

> [3] fake no 21.71 support at all on unsupported subfunctions of EDR-DOS
> i.e. return CF unchanged, al=0. This might show less ingenious programmers
> that this function is not supported. (But could break other software.)

Works very well for me, and can be switched at any time.

> I'm still of the opinion that you have to expect error code 0001h on LFN
> (sub)functions as well. It's just what MS-DOS would do if some (say, the
> SUBST-related) 21.71 functions but not all were supported.

OK, Japheth isn't and there is again no only valid specification defining how things are supposed to work, as usual :confused: At least I got a "fix" that works for me :-)

> Considered creating a new thread?

Of course NO, just to be prepared to the hypothetical case that someone wants to fix the bugs one day I prefer to bunch them together so they can be found easily :-P

---
This is a LOGITECH mouse driver, but some software expect here
the following string:*** This is Copyright 1983 Microsoft ***

 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22752 Postings in 2119 Threads, 402 registered users (0 online)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum