Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

GPL vs. BSD (Developers)

posted by Rugxulo Homepage, Usono, 19.06.2009, 06:54

>
> > but I have doubts, it is GPL, which I prefer to ignore for
> > certain reasons.
>
> Because you can't use the source to make money? Although I don't fear to
> release my own work with a 2-clause BSD-type license (or sometimes as
> Public Domain), I don't think using the GPL is too egoistic either.
>
> However I'm not that sceptic about giving little hints about the binary's
> operations to people either. Think of it as technical documentation, which
> of course is usable for software licensed any way. Just don't copy the
> provided source code because that's restricted to the GPL.

The *BSD camps seem to strongly dislike GPL, and they flat out refuse to touch GPL3. Hence, they are scrambling to get away from GCC although that isn't too feasible just yet (PCC is weak, Clang sorta works, but only GCC supports Obj. C and C++ well enough so far). Honestly, I think we all waste our time due to silly politics, marketing, etc. I think if we all weren't so petty and argumentative, we'd get more done. But NIH is a strong disease, apparently. (I prefer no license at all, honestly, pure "public domain", but at the same time, having full sources is definitely ideal.)

 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22760 Postings in 2121 Threads, 402 registered users (2 online)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum