DOS ain't dead

Separate UIDE-M Driver Might Be Better! (Announce)

posted by Arjay, 07.05.2010, 22:31
(edited by Arjay on 07.05.2010, 23:10)

> a separate UIDE-M driver with "memory only" caching
Sounds like a very good plan.

> As you seem to see value in such a driver, I will look into writing UIDE-M
Great - Thank you! I was particularly thinking of several people whom I know are doing important scientific/environmental research using tried and tested hardware and DOS apps. Indeed this discussion has just reminded me that NASA also like 8086's and DOS for storage. Has any of your code been into space yet? :)

> and my Thanks for this thought, as well!
No problem.

Complete thread:

• Need User Comment Re: Possible UIDE /P Changes! - Jack, 05.05.2010, 21:34 (Announce)
  • Need User Comment Re: Possible UIDE /P Changes! - Arjay, 05.05.2010, 23:12
    • My Thanks, Arjay! - Jack, 06.05.2010, 01:00
      • My Thanks, Arjay! - Arjay, 06.05.2010, 01:50
  • Need User Comment Re: Possible UIDE /P Changes! - Zyzzle, 05.05.2010, 23:17
    • My Thanks, Zyzzle! - Jack, 06.05.2010, 01:09
  • With Regret, Shall Not Update UIDE /P! - Jack, 07.05.2010, 04:55
    • With Regret, Shall Not Update UIDE /P! - Arjay, 07.05.2010, 21:38
      • Separate UIDE-M Driver Might Be Better! - Jack, 07.05.2010, 22:02
        • Separate UIDE-M Driver Might Be Better! - Arjay, 07.05.2010, 22:31
        • See also private message - Arjay, 07.05.2010, 23:07