Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

DOSLFN LOW OR HIGH (Users)

posted by Rugxulo Homepage, Usono, 16.02.2011, 18:04

> Try Moving DOSLFN's position in the CONFIG.SYS load order to an earlier
> position. It may be that the initalization size of DOSLFN is larger than
> the largest available upper memory block therefor DOSLFN is forced to load
> low. Try loading the drivers and TSR's that have the smallest footprint
> last. This may requirer mutiple reboots untill you get it right. The quick
> way to test this is if you "comment out" anything that is currently loading
> befor DOSLFN other than JEMM that create the UMB's and see if DOSLFN will
> then load. If it does then you can play around with the load order untill
> you get the optimal setup. Stephen

Now you got me thinking: maybe "DOS=HIGH,UMB" eats up too much? Also, I forget exactly, never tested, but MS-DOS vs. DR-DOS had a different way of doing things, one loaded everything in order as listed, the other not. Perhaps somebody here knows more specifics about that.

 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22762 Postings in 2122 Threads, 402 registered users (1 online)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum