DOS ain't dead - @rugxulo: Jemm "exception 09" problem

Japheth

Germany (South),
03.11.2007, 08:23
(edited by Japheth, 03.11.2007, 09:40)

@rugxulo: Jemm "exception 09" problem (DOSX)

Hello,

what happened to your "Exception 09" problem on a P4:
Jemm v5.66 : exception 09 on Intel P4 w/ Ultra IDE BIOS ext.

You might haven't noticed, but to analyze this problem I added something in Jemm v5.67, see this link:
Jemm v5.66 : exception 09 on Intel P4 w/ Ultra IDE BIOS ext.
and got no response so far.

Recently, there was another similiar error report I got via PM. To confirm that both crashes happen at the very same EIP, it would be good if you can do another test with your machine *and* Jemm v5.67.

---
MS-DOS forever!

Rugxulo

Usono,
04.11.2007, 05:19

@ Japheth

@rugxulo: Jemm "exception 09" problem

Post reply

> what happened to your "Exception 09" problem on a P4:
> ...
> Recently, there was another similar error report I got via PM. To confirm
> that both crashes happen at the very same EIP, it would be good if you can
> do another test with your machine *and* Jemm v5.67.

I tested today my disks with JEMM 5.67 (final), but I haven't reproduced the problem mentioned above. Originally, I think I had been using "I=TEST" at least, but I scrapped that because of fear of losing stability. Maybe I should undo that and try again? So far, nothing major has cropped up, but I don't test the P4 that often anymore.

---
Know your limits.h

Japheth

Germany (South),
04.11.2007, 19:21

@ Rugxulo

@rugxulo: Jemm "exception 09" problem

Post reply

> I tested today my disks with JEMM 5.67 (final), but I haven't reproduced
> the problem mentioned above. Originally, I think I had been using "I=TEST"
> at least, but I scrapped that because of fear of losing stability. Maybe I
> should undo that and try again? So far, nothing major has cropped up, but
> I don't test the P4 that often anymore.

I=TEST is irrelevant AFAICT.

---
MS-DOS forever!