Japheth![]() Germany (South), 03.09.2011, 08:18 |
Patch for DOSLFN 0.40e (Users) |
Hello, --- |
ecm![]() ![]() Düsseldorf, Germany, 03.09.2011, 15:24 @ Japheth |
Patch for DOSLFN 0.40e |
> Also, the fix is for the source code only, because DOSLFN is copyrighted --- |
Rugxulo![]() Usono, 03.09.2011, 21:53 @ Japheth |
Patch for DOSLFN 0.40e |
> as some of you are probably aware of, DOSLFN 0.40e from Jason Hood has (a) |
Rugxulo![]() Usono, 03.09.2011, 23:31 @ Rugxulo |
Patch for DOSLFN 0.40e |
> > I was able to track (one of) the bug(s) down. |
Japheth![]() Germany (South), 04.09.2011, 03:14 @ Rugxulo |
Patch for DOSLFN 0.40e |
> Apparently there's another bug (regression) discovered by Juan on --- |
DOS386 04.09.2011, 12:52 @ Japheth |
Patch for DOSLFN 0.40e | INT $21 / AX=$71A6 (GFIBH) |
> Why? Because it's known and old hat that DOSLFN does NOT support function 71A6 --- |
Laaca![]() Czech republic, 11.09.2011, 22:19 @ DOS386 |
Patch for DOSLFN 0.40e | INT $21 / AX=$71A6 (GFIBH) |
Today I compiled your patch with TASM 4.1 and it worked without any problems. Thanks Japheth! --- |
RayeR![]() CZ, 12.09.2011, 13:51 @ Laaca |
Patch for DOSLFN 0.40e | INT $21 / AX=$71A6 (GFIBH) |
> Today I compiled your patch with TASM 4.1 and it worked without any --- |
Rugxulo![]() Usono, 17.09.2011, 20:02 @ RayeR |
Patch for DOSLFN 0.40e (Japheth) |
> > Today I compiled your patch with TASM 4.1 and it worked without any |
RayeR![]() CZ, 19.09.2011, 15:18 @ Rugxulo |
Patch for DOSLFN 0.40e (Japheth) |
> doslf40f.zip --- |
tikbalang 19.09.2011, 16:08 @ RayeR |
Patch for DOSLFN 0.40e (Japheth) |
> > |
tikbalang 19.09.2011, 16:26 @ tikbalang |
Patch for DOSLFN 0.40e (Japheth) |
> |
Rugxulo![]() Usono, 19.09.2011, 23:22 @ tikbalang |
Patch for DOSLFN 0.40e (Japheth) |
> > |
DOS386 06.09.2011, 06:23 @ Japheth |
Patch for DGJPP 2.04 |
> And my suspicion is that DGVJJ does NOT call this function "very carefully". --- |