| DOS386 29.08.2007, 16:36 |
Arachne DOS browser and piracy :-( (Miscellaneous) |
2 news: --- |
| Steve US, 29.08.2007, 21:08 @ DOS386 |
Arachne DOS browser and piracy :-( |
> 2 news: |
| rr Berlin, Germany, 29.08.2007, 21:31 @ Steve |
Arachne DOS browser and piracy :-( |
> > Arachne is hosted by SourceForge now: --- |
| Steve US, 30.08.2007, 00:28 @ rr |
Arachne DOS browser and piracy |
> > > Arachne is hosted by SourceForge now: |
| rr Berlin, Germany, 29.08.2007, 21:30 @ DOS386 |
Arachne DOS browser and piracy :-( |
> It still doesn't work for me. Tried again: --- |
| Rugxulo Usono, 30.08.2007, 03:50 @ DOS386 |
Arachne DOS browser and piracy :-( |
> Arachne is hosted by SourceForge now: --- |
| Japheth Germany (South), 30.08.2007, 07:32 @ DOS386 |
Arachne DOS browser and piracy :-( |
> I wonder how many people (except K. Udo) actually had Arachne working or --- |
| Matjaz Maribor, Slovenia, 30.08.2007, 21:32 @ DOS386 |
Arachne DOS browser and piracy :-( |
> Need a driver |
| DOS386 31.08.2007, 07:03 @ Matjaz |
Arachne DOS browser and piracy :-( |
Matjaz wrote: --- |
| rr Berlin, Germany, 31.08.2007, 10:11 @ DOS386 |
Arachne DOS browser and piracy :-( |
> Good. I'll have to look for a RTL-8139 at worst --- |
| Matjaz Maribor, Slovenia, 31.08.2007, 11:03 @ rr |
Arachne DOS browser and piracy :-( |
> see |
| rr Berlin, Germany, 31.08.2007, 11:55 @ Matjaz |
Arachne DOS browser and piracy :-( |
> > > Linksys EtherPCI LAN Card II --- |
| Matjaz Maribor, Slovenia, 31.08.2007, 16:22 @ rr |
Arachne DOS browser and piracy :-( |
> I really dislike those driver sites. |
| DOS386 02.09.2007, 12:49 (edited by DOS386, 02.09.2007, 16:36) @ Matjaz |
Arachne DOS browser and piracy :-( |
Thanks. --- |
| Matjaz Maribor, Slovenia, 02.09.2007, 14:54 @ DOS386 |
Arachne DOS browser and piracy :-( |
> The file is a DOS ARJ SFX and extracts to 100 files, with a very small |
| DOS386 02.09.2007, 16:34 @ Matjaz |
Arachne DOS browser works !!! |
> So you are trying to setup a local network? Because that's wat this --- |
| rr Berlin, Germany, 02.09.2007, 17:28 @ DOS386 |
Arachne DOS browser works !!! |
> - Download stuff (slow (?), when ZIP download done, it displays contents --- |
| Laaca Czech republic, 02.09.2007, 21:04 @ DOS386 |
Arachne DOS browser works !!! |
If you download a file you have to |
| Rugxulo Usono, 31.08.2007, 23:36 (edited by Rugxulo, 31.08.2007, 23:48) @ rr |
LXPIC |
> > Bad idea. LXPIC's support of JPG is limited, and no PNG support al all --- |
| Rugxulo Usono, 01.09.2007, 17:26 @ rr |
.PNG support |
> > Good. I'll have to look for a RTL-8139 at worst --- |
| rr Berlin, Germany, 01.09.2007, 20:44 @ Rugxulo |
.PNG support |
> You tested zlib with OW 1.7-RC2, no? Did you only compile to 32-bit or did --- |
| Rugxulo Usono, 02.09.2007, 03:15 @ rr |
.PNG support |
> > Actually, I don't know if a 16-bit DOS .PNG viewer even exists --- |
| DOS386 02.09.2007, 12:32 @ Rugxulo |
.PNG support | Stefan | PNG obsolete ?? |
Rugxulo wrote: --- |
| Rugxulo Usono, 02.09.2007, 22:05 @ DOS386 |
.PNG support | Stefan | PNG obsolete ?? |
> Mostly true ... just no PNG and limited JPG support only, and some others --- |
| DOS386 05.09.2007, 02:39 @ Rugxulo |
.PNG support | Stefan | PNG obsolete ?? |
> "No" only to source release, redistribution is okay. I didn't ask about .PNG, --- |
| Steve US, 02.09.2007, 01:42 @ Rugxulo |
.PNG support |
> Actually, I don't know if a 16-bit DOS .PNG viewer even exists (anyone??). |
| DOS386 02.09.2007, 12:24 @ Steve |
.PNG support |
> CompuShow / CShow - Apparently free --- |
| Steve US, 14.09.2007, 10:19 @ Steve |
.PNG support |
The NOMMSI Viewer handles "OS/2 Bitmap arrays, IFF HAM coding and PBM FORMs, PCX CGA/EGA images, PNG alpha chanel, gamma correction and many TIFF extensions..." |
| rr Berlin, Germany, 14.09.2007, 10:27 @ Steve |
.PNG support |
> The NOMMSI Viewer handles "OS/2 Bitmap arrays, IFF HAM coding and PBM --- |
| Rugxulo Usono, 15.09.2007, 04:28 @ rr |
.PNG support |
> Month ago I had a short "discussion" with Jacques about NV's license and --- |
| rr Berlin, Germany, 16.09.2007, 18:07 @ Rugxulo |
.PNG support |
> You mean about this? --- |
| Rugxulo Usono, 16.09.2007, 21:48 @ rr |
.PNG support |
> > > The NOMSSI Viewer for DPMI (NVX) was never ShareWare. --- |
| Steve US, 15.09.2007, 08:46 @ rr |
NOMSSI Viewer |
> Month ago I had a short "discussion" with Jacques about NV's license and |
| rr Berlin, Germany, 16.09.2007, 18:07 @ Steve |
NOMSSI Viewer |
> If he shows no interest in taking your money, does that mean it's free? --- |
| DOS386 02.09.2007, 12:21 @ rr |
Arachne DOS browser | Eric's SLEEP |
> get PCISLEEP from Eric Auer's website and post output from --- |
| rr Berlin, Germany, 02.09.2007, 18:30 @ DOS386 |
Arachne DOS browser | Eric's SLEEP |
> > get PCISLEEP from Eric Auer's website and post output from --- |
| Rugxulo Usono, 31.08.2007, 23:47 @ DOS386 |
list of Arachne forums (for potential helpers) |
FYI, here's what Glenn told me recently (22 August 2007): --- |
| DOS386 11.09.2007, 06:29 @ DOS386 |
Arachne DOS browser and Ethernet cards |
BTW, anyone got such an Ethernet card working in DOS so far ? --- |
| rr Berlin, Germany, 11.09.2007, 14:53 @ DOS386 |
Arachne DOS browser and Ethernet cards |
> BTW, anyone got such an Ethernet card working in DOS so far ? --- |
| DOS386 13.09.2007, 03:02 @ rr |
Arachne DOS browser and Ethernet cards |
--- |
| rr Berlin, Germany, 13.09.2007, 10:00 @ DOS386 |
Arachne DOS browser and Ethernet cards |
> Only thing looking crappy is the non-DOS BOCHS stuff --- |
| DOS386 16.09.2007, 00:31 @ rr |
Arachne DOS browser and Ethernet cards |
> You already spammed Dr-DOS Wiki. --- |
Thread view
... almost ... looks nice, but graphics is somewhat buggy occasionally ... other "minor" problem: no access to the Internet
Arachne includes support for cca 3 cards, none of them matched (surprisingly ?) ...
![[image]](http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/5210/shotxf4.png)

Found:

Please get PCISLEEP from Eric Auer's website and post output from
PNG "really just" as temporary hack obsoleted by LZW84 patent expiry ? PNG is the by far most useful image format ... and if a browser or viewer doesn't support it - fault of the browser or viewer
And it's for photographic images as well (lostless, but less compression than JPG of course) 
![[image]](http://pan.fotovista.com/dev/6/6/12020166/l_12020166.jpg)
![[image]](http://img160.imageshack.us/img160/5254/bttrqv2.png)