| DOS386 28.08.2008, 06:06 |
DOS drivers (Miscellaneous) |
Is it legal to write about DOS drivers here ? IIRC I placed such a post here few days ago and can't find it anymore. --- |
| rr Berlin, Germany, 28.08.2008, 10:01 @ DOS386 |
DOS drivers |
> Is it legal to write about DOS drivers here ? --- |
| Steve US, 28.08.2008, 11:31 @ rr |
DOS drivers |
> > Is it legal to write about DOS drivers here ? |
| rr Berlin, Germany, 28.08.2008, 13:08 @ Steve |
DOS drivers |
> O.K., guys - what's up? --- |
| DOS386 10.09.2008, 03:08 @ rr |
Double standards -> Abuse of power -> Lucho proven right |
> I just removed your post. --- |
| Japheth Germany (South), 10.09.2008, 08:11 @ DOS386 |
Double standards -> Abuse of power -> Lucho proven right |
> How many posts did you delete before ? Maybe mine was the very 1st one and --- |
| rr Berlin, Germany, 10.09.2008, 12:00 @ DOS386 |
Double standards -> Abuse of power -> Lucho proven right |
> > Yes, it is. But not in the way you did. --- |
| DOS386 29.12.2008, 02:05 @ rr |
Double standards -> Abuse of power -> Lucho proven right |
> remember how you spelled the driver's name and to what URL you linked. --- |
| ecm Düsseldorf, Germany, 29.12.2008, 13:15 @ DOS386 |
Double standards -> Abuse of power -> Lucho proven right |
> > remember how you spelled the driver's name and to what URL you linked. --- |
Thread view

From your act I have to assume that announcing M64's excellent high speed USB 2.0 support is very DOS related and very appreciated here (besides 7-ZIP for Windows and many other of his by now 539 posts), but DOS drivers aren't. Thus you finally gave Lucho (now banned from here) right who IIRC wrote "will be never again driver releases for DOS after the echo on Jack's drivers".