DOS ain't dead

Patch for DOSLFN 0.40e (Users)

posted by Rugxulo , Usono, 03.09.2011, 23:31

> > I was able to track (one of) the bug(s) down.

Apparently there's another bug (regression) discovered by Juan on comp.os.msdos.djgpp (re: DJGPP 2.04 w/ MS-DOS 6.22 + DOSLFN 0.40e):

> I have found my old FreeDOS CD and installed DOSLFN 0.40c.
> With this driver everthing works on MSDOS. Stepping into
> the filelength() code shows that the 0.40e version does
> not set the CF when it returns from 0x71A6 call while 0.40c
> does so that it jumps directly into the 0x4201 code instead
> of returning an EOVERFLOW.

Complete thread:

• Patch for DOSLFN 0.40e - Japheth, 03.09.2011, 08:18 (Users)
  • Patch for DOSLFN 0.40e - ecm, 03.09.2011, 15:24
  • Patch for DOSLFN 0.40e - Rugxulo, 03.09.2011, 21:53
    • Patch for DOSLFN 0.40e - Rugxulo, 03.09.2011, 23:31
      • Patch for DOSLFN 0.40e - Japheth, 04.09.2011, 03:14
        • Patch for DOSLFN 0.40e | INT $21 / AX=$71A6 (GFIBH) - DOS386, 04.09.2011, 12:52
          • Patch for DOSLFN 0.40e | INT $21 / AX=$71A6 (GFIBH) - Laaca, 11.09.2011, 22:19
            • Patch for DOSLFN 0.40e | INT $21 / AX=$71A6 (GFIBH) - RayeR, 12.09.2011, 13:51
              • Patch for DOSLFN 0.40e (Japheth) - Rugxulo, 17.09.2011, 20:02
                • Patch for DOSLFN 0.40e (Japheth) - RayeR, 19.09.2011, 15:18
                  • Patch for DOSLFN 0.40e (Japheth) - tikbalang, 19.09.2011, 16:08
                    • Patch for DOSLFN 0.40e (Japheth) - tikbalang, 19.09.2011, 16:26
                      • Patch for DOSLFN 0.40e (Japheth) - Rugxulo, 19.09.2011, 23:22
        • Patch for DGJPP 2.04 - DOS386, 06.09.2011, 06:23