DOS ain't dead - HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8

HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 (DOSX)

posted by rr , Berlin, Germany, 09.08.2007, 10:26

> > DJGPP port is broken. That's why I called this thread "HX vs HT
> > Editor". ;-)
>
> The DOS port has been officially abandoned since 0.7.5. (However, I've

Yes, I know.

> been told it doesn't need flex or bison, but I still haven't tried
> compiling again yet. Supposedly, the author just opened RHIDE, added all
> files, and then compiled.)

That's exactly, what Sebastian Biallas told me. :-P

---
Forum admin

Post reply

Complete thread:

HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - rr, 23.07.2007, 09:56 (DOSX)
- HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - Rugxulo, 25.07.2007, 00:57
  - HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - rr, 25.07.2007, 12:51
    - HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - Japheth, 26.07.2007, 14:14
      - HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - rr, 26.07.2007, 14:58
        HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - Japheth, 26.07.2007, 15:11
        HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - rr, 26.07.2007, 15:19
        HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - rr, 27.07.2007, 10:09
        HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - rr, 27.07.2007, 11:43
        HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - Japheth, 27.07.2007, 12:15
    - HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - Rugxulo, 03.08.2007, 05:16
      - HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - Rugxulo, 05.08.2007, 05:27
        HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - rr, 05.08.2007, 21:13
        HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - Rugxulo, 09.08.2007, 01:49
        HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - rr, 09.08.2007, 10:26
        HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - rr, 09.08.2007, 10:32
- HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - rr, 17.08.2007, 13:26
  - HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - Japheth, 17.08.2007, 19:58
    - HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - Rugxulo, 18.08.2007, 05:53
      - HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - Japheth, 18.08.2007, 16:34