DOS ain't dead

HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 (DOSX)

posted by Rugxulo , Usono, 18.08.2007, 05:53

> it's a bug in HT. :)

Seriously? (I can't tell.)

> I read in the HT help that DGJPP is supported as target. Where is the
> binary?

I don't think so (unless something changed from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9, highly unlikely). The author told me via e-mail that DJGPP wasn't supported since 0.7.5 (which does have a binary available).

Complete thread:

• HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - rr, 23.07.2007, 09:56 (DOSX)
  • HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - Rugxulo, 25.07.2007, 00:57
    • HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - rr, 25.07.2007, 12:51
      • HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - Japheth, 26.07.2007, 14:14
        • HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - rr, 26.07.2007, 14:58
          • HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - Japheth, 26.07.2007, 15:11
            • HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - rr, 26.07.2007, 15:19
            • HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - rr, 27.07.2007, 10:09
              • HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - rr, 27.07.2007, 11:43
                • HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - Japheth, 27.07.2007, 12:15
      • HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - Rugxulo, 03.08.2007, 05:16
        • HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - Rugxulo, 05.08.2007, 05:27
          • HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - rr, 05.08.2007, 21:13
            • HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - Rugxulo, 09.08.2007, 01:49
              • HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - rr, 09.08.2007, 10:26
              • HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - rr, 09.08.2007, 10:32
  • HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - rr, 17.08.2007, 13:26
    • HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - Japheth, 17.08.2007, 19:58
      • HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - Rugxulo, 18.08.2007, 05:53
        • HX 2.12 vs HT Editor 2.0.8 - Japheth, 18.08.2007, 16:34