DOS ain't dead

Alternative for M$ CP/M assembler M80 & L80 for DOS/Win32? (Users)

posted by Rugxulo , Usono, 05.12.2024, 04:52

> > Well, I compiled the NTVCM. It required updating my OpenWatcom
> toolchain.

I did mention it needed v2. I have not tested much since I'm not directly familiar with CP/M.

> > Also my mingw64/g++-8.1.0 seems to be too old to know advanced c++
> > features...

G++ 8.x should be circa 2018, so it can't be "too old" (IMHO). I would be surprised if he is using C++17 or newer.

However, be careful of what the default dialect used is. You may have to override it manually. (For comparison, upcoming GCC 15 has C23 as default, since that was just published/finalized, or more likely their "gnu23" variant.)

> Hm, even with latest mingw I'm unable to compile NTVCM for windows.
>
> Well, I fixed it by adding
> #ifdef _WIN32
> #include <process.h>
> #endif

IIRC, MingW [sic] is not supported anymore, most people use MingW-w64. I looked at one of them (for something a while back) but balked at the 500 MB download and Win10 suggested minimum requirement. Granted, that covers a lot of ground (popular libraries and tools), but meh.

> So I step further to compile the monitor source.

I forgot about Alfred Arnold's AS cross-assembler. (In fairness, I haven't used most of these tools and don't have direct experience, so I'm little help.)

Complete thread:

• Alternative for M$ CP/M assembler M80 & L80 for DOS/Win32? - RayeR, 02.12.2024, 17:48 (Users)
  • Alternative for M$ CP/M assembler M80 & L80 for DOS/Win32? - DosWorld, 02.12.2024, 20:52
    • Alternative for M$ CP/M assembler M80 & L80 for DOS/Win32? - RayeR, 03.12.2024, 00:04
      • Alternative for M$ CP/M assembler M80 & L80 for DOS/Win32? - Rugxulo, 03.12.2024, 05:42
        • Alternative for M$ CP/M assembler M80 & L80 for DOS/Win32? - Rugxulo, 03.12.2024, 08:09
          • Alternative for M$ CP/M assembler M80 & L80 for DOS/Win32? - DosWorld, 03.12.2024, 11:09
            • Alternative for M$ CP/M assembler M80 & L80 for DOS/Win32? - Rugxulo, 06.12.2024, 05:43
        • Alternative for M$ CP/M assembler M80 & L80 for DOS/Win32? - RayeR, 03.12.2024, 16:54
          • Alternative for M$ CP/M assembler M80 & L80 for DOS/Win32? - Ruud, 03.12.2024, 19:43
            • Alternative for M$ CP/M assembler M80 & L80 for DOS/Win32? - RayeR, 04.12.2024, 04:11
          • Alternative for M$ CP/M assembler M80 & L80 for DOS/Win32? - RayeR, 04.12.2024, 06:20
            • Alternative for M$ CP/M assembler M80 & L80 for DOS/Win32? - RayeR, 04.12.2024, 20:06
              • Alternative for M$ CP/M assembler M80 & L80 for DOS/Win32? - Rugxulo, 05.12.2024, 04:52
                • Alternative for M$ CP/M assembler M80 & L80 for DOS/Win32? - RayeR, 05.12.2024, 08:01
        • Alternative for M$ CP/M assembler M80 & L80 for DOS/Win32? - roytam, 06.12.2024, 07:25
          • Alternative for M$ CP/M assembler M80 & L80 for DOS/Win32? - RayeR, 07.12.2024, 08:54
        • Alternative for CP/M assembler M80&L80 for DOS/Win32-solved - RayeR, 09.12.2024, 01:30
          • Alternative for CP/M assembler M80&L80 for DOS/Win32-solved - DosWorld, 10.12.2024, 18:42
            • Alternative for CP/M assembler M80&L80 for DOS/Win32-solved - RayeR, 13.12.2024, 01:52