DOS for 64 bits? (Users)
> Dunno, not to be too simplistic, but I'm just grateful anything works.
Oh, don't forget 8086tiny (written in C). Yes, it's an emulator, but maybe that would be more acceptable for some things? ecm had a bugfixed fork with proper 186 support.
Complete thread:
- DOS for 64 bits? - libz, 17.10.2025, 23:37 (Users)
![Open in board view [Board]](img/board_d.gif)
![Open in mix view [Mix]](img/mix_d.gif)
- DOS for 64 bits? - kerravon, 18.10.2025, 10:34
- DOS for 64 bits? - kerravon, 18.10.2025, 10:38
- DOS for 64 bits? - kerravon, 18.10.2025, 11:03
- DOS for 64 bits? - libz, 22.10.2025, 22:00
- DOS for 64 bits? - kerravon, 23.10.2025, 04:16
- DOS for 64 bits? - kerravon, 23.10.2025, 04:29
- DOS for 64 bits? - kerravon, 23.10.2025, 05:59
- DOS for 64 bits? - libz, 27.10.2025, 12:07
- DOS for 64 bits? - kerravon, 27.10.2025, 13:17
- DOS for 64 bits? - Rugxulo, 29.10.2025, 01:04
- DOS for 64 bits? - Rugxulo, 29.10.2025, 01:06
- DOS for 64 bits? - marcov, 29.10.2025, 10:58
- DOS for 64 bits? - libz, 07.11.2025, 16:47
- DOS for 64 bits? - kerravon, 08.11.2025, 00:50
- DOS for 64 bits? - Rugxulo, 29.10.2025, 01:04
- DOS for 64 bits? - kerravon, 27.10.2025, 13:17
- DOS for 64 bits? - kerravon, 23.10.2025, 04:16
- DOS for 64 bits? - libz, 22.10.2025, 22:00
- DOS for 64 bits? - kerravon, 18.10.2025, 11:03
- DOS for 64 bits? - kerravon, 18.10.2025, 10:38
- DOS for 64 bits? - kerravon, 18.10.2025, 10:34
Mix view