DOS ain't dead

print_daemon_in_DOS -> print_into_a_file_in_DOS (Miscellaneous)

posted by rr  , Berlin, Germany, 19.02.2008, 16:13

> I don't know if his intention is to print to a shared printer. He didn't
> say a word about such a situation.

A "NET" printer is a shared printer!

Btw: Most (cheap) USB printers are dumb, because all intelligence is already in their Windows driver. To make these printers work in DOS, one would have to develop a completely new driver using DosUSB. Good luck!

---
Forum admin

Complete thread:

• print_daemon_in_DOS - david, 15.02.2008, 08:04 (Miscellaneous)
  • print_daemon_in_DOS -> print_into_a_file_in_DOS - DOS386, 19.02.2008, 02:04
    • print_daemon_in_DOS -> print_into_a_file_in_DOS - david, 19.02.2008, 15:25
      • print_daemon_in_DOS -> print_into_a_file_in_DOS - Khusraw, 19.02.2008, 15:33
        • print_daemon_in_DOS -> print_into_a_file_in_DOS - david, 21.02.2008, 13:42
          • print_daemon_in_DOS -> print_into_a_file_in_DOS - Khusraw, 21.02.2008, 14:56
      • print_daemon_in_DOS -> print_into_a_file_in_DOS - rr, 19.02.2008, 15:43
        • print_daemon_in_DOS -> print_into_a_file_in_DOS - Khusraw, 19.02.2008, 15:53
          • print_daemon_in_DOS -> print_into_a_file_in_DOS - rr, 19.02.2008, 16:13
            • print_daemon_in_DOS -> print_into_a_file_in_DOS - Khusraw, 19.02.2008, 16:26
              • print_daemon_in_DOS -> print_into_a_file_in_DOS - Laaca, 19.02.2008, 19:59
                • print_daemon_in_DOS -> print_into_a_file_in_DOS - DOS386, 20.02.2008, 01:36
      • print_daemon_in_DOS -> print_into_a_file_in_DOS - DOS386, 20.02.2008, 01:06