DOS ain't dead

print_daemon_in_DOS -> print_into_a_file_in_DOS (Miscellaneous)

posted by Khusraw, 19.02.2008, 16:26

> A "NET" printer is a shared printer!

You are right, I didn't notice the word 'NET'.

> Btw: Most (cheap) USB printers are dumb, because all intelligence is
> already in their Windows driver.

Most USB printers are cheap, and they are built considering to be dependent on OS software.

Complete thread:

• print_daemon_in_DOS - david, 15.02.2008, 08:04 (Miscellaneous)
  • print_daemon_in_DOS -> print_into_a_file_in_DOS - DOS386, 19.02.2008, 02:04
    • print_daemon_in_DOS -> print_into_a_file_in_DOS - david, 19.02.2008, 15:25
      • print_daemon_in_DOS -> print_into_a_file_in_DOS - Khusraw, 19.02.2008, 15:33
        • print_daemon_in_DOS -> print_into_a_file_in_DOS - david, 21.02.2008, 13:42
          • print_daemon_in_DOS -> print_into_a_file_in_DOS - Khusraw, 21.02.2008, 14:56
      • print_daemon_in_DOS -> print_into_a_file_in_DOS - rr, 19.02.2008, 15:43
        • print_daemon_in_DOS -> print_into_a_file_in_DOS - Khusraw, 19.02.2008, 15:53
          • print_daemon_in_DOS -> print_into_a_file_in_DOS - rr, 19.02.2008, 16:13
            • print_daemon_in_DOS -> print_into_a_file_in_DOS - Khusraw, 19.02.2008, 16:26
              • print_daemon_in_DOS -> print_into_a_file_in_DOS - Laaca, 19.02.2008, 19:59
                • print_daemon_in_DOS -> print_into_a_file_in_DOS - DOS386, 20.02.2008, 01:36
      • print_daemon_in_DOS -> print_into_a_file_in_DOS - DOS386, 20.02.2008, 01:06