DOS ain't dead

IDE performance | bugs in IDECHECK, UIDE, XDMA, XDMA32 (Users)

posted by Japheth , Germany (South), 10.09.2008, 07:50

> I13 doesn't work on some PC's, while PIO and DMA always do. Report
> is not very well formatted (minor bug), but what's worse, I13 doesn't work
> at all, no idea why

Did you read the readme.txt and tried /S:127? Some BIOSes are unable to read a full 64 kB block with int 13h ( /S:128, which is the default and max ).

> - XDMA32 is faster than IDECHECK. Is it possible ? PIO of IDECHECK cca 9
> MiB/s, DMA of IDECHECK cca 15 MiB/s, I13 of IDECHECK via XDMA32 18 MiB/s
> !!! Bug or "feature" ?

I don't know.

---
MS-DOS forever!

Complete thread:

• IDE performance | bugs in IDECHECK, UIDE, XDMA, XDMA32 - DOS386, 10.09.2008, 02:41 (Users)
  • IDE performance | bugs in IDECHECK, UIDE, XDMA, XDMA32 - Japheth, 10.09.2008, 07:50
    • IDE performance | bugs in IDECHECK, UIDE, XDMA, XDMA32 - DOS386, 23.09.2008, 15:58
      • IDE performance | bugs in IDECHECK, UIDE, XDMA, XDMA32 - DOS386, 25.09.2008, 16:00
        • IDE performance | new bugs discovered in IDECHECK - DOS386, 04.10.2008, 04:57
          • IDE performance | new bugs discovered in IDECHECK - Japheth, 04.10.2008, 09:01
            • IDE performance | new bugs discovered in IDECHECK - DOS386, 05.10.2008, 13:58
  • IDE performance | bugs in IDECHECK, UIDE, XDMA, XDMA32 - rr, 10.09.2008, 11:57
  • IDE performance | bugs in IDECHECK, UIDE, XDMA, XDMA32 - RayeR, 10.09.2008, 15:34
    • IDE performance | bugs in IDECHECK, UIDE, XDMA, XDMA32 - Rugxulo, 10.09.2008, 16:03
  • IDE performance | bugs in IDECHECK, UIDE, XDMA, XDMA32 - Khusraw, 10.09.2008, 16:12