DOS ain't dead

IDE performance | new bugs discovered in IDECHECK (Users)

posted by Japheth , Germany (South), 04.10.2008, 09:01

> - /NOI hack doesn't work. Symptoms range from suspiciously good
> results (up to 2 seconds to "read" the complete HD, no time for the
> activity light to even go on ), through HDPMI exceptions up to low
> memory corruption (freezer, DOS kernel puking). What is it supposed to do
> at all ? Anyone can reproduce it ?

/NOI shouldn't be used. It cannot work currently, because it needs the assembly time switch ?SETHDIRQ to be 1 - and IIRC the switch is 0 ... and it must be 0 .

---
MS-DOS forever!

Complete thread:

• IDE performance | bugs in IDECHECK, UIDE, XDMA, XDMA32 - DOS386, 10.09.2008, 02:41 (Users)
  • IDE performance | bugs in IDECHECK, UIDE, XDMA, XDMA32 - Japheth, 10.09.2008, 07:50
    • IDE performance | bugs in IDECHECK, UIDE, XDMA, XDMA32 - DOS386, 23.09.2008, 15:58
      • IDE performance | bugs in IDECHECK, UIDE, XDMA, XDMA32 - DOS386, 25.09.2008, 16:00
        • IDE performance | new bugs discovered in IDECHECK - DOS386, 04.10.2008, 04:57
          • IDE performance | new bugs discovered in IDECHECK - Japheth, 04.10.2008, 09:01
            • IDE performance | new bugs discovered in IDECHECK - DOS386, 05.10.2008, 13:58
  • IDE performance | bugs in IDECHECK, UIDE, XDMA, XDMA32 - rr, 10.09.2008, 11:57
  • IDE performance | bugs in IDECHECK, UIDE, XDMA, XDMA32 - RayeR, 10.09.2008, 15:34
    • IDE performance | bugs in IDECHECK, UIDE, XDMA, XDMA32 - Rugxulo, 10.09.2008, 16:03
  • IDE performance | bugs in IDECHECK, UIDE, XDMA, XDMA32 - Khusraw, 10.09.2008, 16:12