Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

Question: best performance of hard disk reading (Users)

posted by Rugxulo Homepage, Usono, 19.07.2010, 12:59

> A disk cache is an area of memory that is set to store the data most
> recently read from the hard disk. But it does not work with the data that
> not yet read.
>
> Need a disk cache utility to store to the FAT and directories completely
> (maybe compressed).This is to improve performance, since the system memory
> is many times faster than the hard disk. Mainly if we consider that the FAT
> is at the beginning of the disc, and all time heads returning to the FAT
> doing slow the reading of files especially that are located in the opposite
> side. I am not have a benchmark to prove it. :-P

I (maybe incorrectly) thought that some DOSes indeed kept the FAT completely in RAM. I'm a bit fuzzy on the details since I never looked too closely, so maybe I'm thinking of only really small disks. (Obviously not FAT32, but if FAT16 is max. 65535 files, would that fit? Arjay? :-) )

Anyways, this is just another example of why we should have native support of ext2 or HPFS or whatever. (Linux gets 40+ FSes and we get only one, whee! It's a pity they don't help us more. If I weren't so dumb ....)

 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22762 Postings in 2122 Threads, 402 registered users (0 online)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum