Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

Question: best performance of hard disk reading (Users)

posted by marcov, 22.07.2010, 05:55

> In a similar mindset if FAT is wasteful as we know in terms of size, rather
> than necessarily worrying about compressing FAT, etc depending on the
> particular situation if you can avoid the need to use FAT in the first
> place. The problem with systems like DOS is people tend to get
> conditioned, e..g. it is natural to think in terms of files, FAT. Which
> interestingly is exactly what Rugxulo picked up on, this very fact that
> often in the DOS world we are still thinking about FAT, files etc.

Afaik many bioses scan the partition table, and revert to alternate boot if no recognizable partition/filesystem scheme is found. This started somewhere in P-II,III times for general clones, but maybe earlier for funky big OEM machines.

Before I would use a raw format of the HD, I would first try to check if this wouldn't bring me more trouble. (it could be solved as easily as keeping a partitiontable and some base FAT structures though)

 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22762 Postings in 2122 Threads, 402 registered users (1 online)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum