GPL: either version 3 of the license, or any later version (Announce)
> As I interpret it the text embedded within in files containing code contain
> the answer to the question:
Yes, I agree.
> My understanding is that the documentation does not need to be GPLed
> explicitly. If it does I can correct that at any time.
I don't think that would be necessary. What I suggested was only to add a statement indicating the precise license/versions to the documentation so that users looking for that information can find it readily available in the documentation, instead of having to look into source code files.
> My intent isn't to get into "license" wars ..
Don't you remember our last? That was way larger than this
I don't prefer GPL (2, 3, or any later version) for what I write and that is really all there is to say on the matter of software licensing preferences right now. I only wanted to point out what I have pointed out now.
> it is to share the code.
That is understood.
Complete thread:
- mTCP Open Source release - mbbrutman, 27.05.2011, 23:47 (Announce)
- mTCP GPL - ecm, 27.05.2011, 23:58
- GPLv3 - mbbrutman, 28.05.2011, 00:20
- GPL: either version 3 of the license, or any later version - ecm, 28.05.2011, 00:55
- GPL: either version 3 of the license, or any later version - mbbrutman, 28.05.2011, 01:09
- GPL: either version 3 of the license, or any later version - ecm, 28.05.2011, 01:18
- GPL: either version 3 of the license, or any later version - mbbrutman, 28.05.2011, 01:25
- download, compile, ... - ecm, 28.05.2011, 01:30
- GPL: either version 3 of the license, or any later version - mbbrutman, 28.05.2011, 01:25
- GPL: either version 3 of the license, or any later version - marcov, 30.05.2011, 09:37
- GPL: either version 3 of the license, or any later version - mbbrutman, 30.05.2011, 15:32
- What does the GPL allow? - ecm, 30.05.2011, 16:08
- What does the GPL allow? - mbbrutman, 30.05.2011, 16:30
- GPL something - ecm, 30.05.2011, 17:08
- GPL something - mbbrutman, 30.05.2011, 18:05
- theoretical licensing problems and such - ecm, 30.05.2011, 18:28
- licensing again... executables - ecm, 30.05.2011, 22:34
- licensing again... executables - mbbrutman, 31.05.2011, 03:33
- licensing again... executables - ecm, 31.05.2011, 13:59
- licensing again... executables - mbbrutman, 01.06.2011, 01:16
- licensing again... executables - ecm, 01.06.2011, 01:53
- licensing again... executables - mbbrutman, 01.06.2011, 02:17
- licensing again... executables - ecm, 01.06.2011, 15:49
- licensing again... executables - mbbrutman, 01.06.2011, 02:17
- licensing again... executables - ecm, 01.06.2011, 01:53
- licensing again... executables - mbbrutman, 01.06.2011, 01:16
- licensing again... executables - ecm, 31.05.2011, 13:59
- licensing again... executables - mbbrutman, 31.05.2011, 03:33
- GPL something - mbbrutman, 30.05.2011, 18:05
- What does the GPL allow? - Rugxulo, 30.05.2011, 18:14
- mTCP in DOSEMU; Linux kernel developers' GPLv2-only reasons - ecm, 30.05.2011, 22:38
- What does the GPL allow? - marcov, 30.05.2011, 22:49
- What does the GPL allow? - mbbrutman, 31.05.2011, 03:41
- What does the GPL allow? - mbbrutman, 31.05.2011, 04:18
- What does the GPL allow? - Japheth, 30.05.2011, 18:47
- Gift trolls and other curiosities - ecm, 30.05.2011, 19:20
- Gift trolls and other curiosities - mbbrutman, 30.05.2011, 19:54
- editing - ecm, 30.05.2011, 20:03
- Gift trolls and other curiosities - mbbrutman, 30.05.2011, 19:54
- Gift trolls and other curiosities - ecm, 30.05.2011, 19:20
- What does the GPL allow? - marcov, 30.05.2011, 22:38
- GPL something - ecm, 30.05.2011, 17:08
- What does the GPL allow? - marcov, 30.05.2011, 22:37
- What does the GPL allow? - mbbrutman, 30.05.2011, 16:30
- GPL: either version 3 of the license, or any later version - marcov, 30.05.2011, 22:35
- GPL: either version 3 of the license, or any later version - mbbrutman, 30.05.2011, 22:56
- GPL: either version 3 of the license, or any later version - marcov, 02.06.2011, 16:10
- GPL: either version 3 of the license, or any later version - mbbrutman, 03.06.2011, 04:12
- GPL: either version 3 of the license, or any later version - marcov, 03.06.2011, 13:36
- GPL: either version 3 of the license, or any later version - Rugxulo, 03.06.2011, 16:45
- GPL: either version 3 of the license, or any later version - marcov, 03.06.2011, 13:36
- GPL: either version 3 of the license, or any later version - mbbrutman, 03.06.2011, 04:12
- GPL: either version 3 of the license, or any later version - marcov, 02.06.2011, 16:10
- GPL: either version 3 of the license, or any later version - mbbrutman, 30.05.2011, 22:56
- What does the GPL allow? - ecm, 30.05.2011, 16:08
- GPL: either version 3 of the license, or any later version - mbbrutman, 30.05.2011, 15:32
- GPL: either version 3 of the license, or any later version - ecm, 28.05.2011, 01:18
- GPL: either version 3 of the license, or any later version - mbbrutman, 28.05.2011, 01:09
- GPL: either version 3 of the license, or any later version - ecm, 28.05.2011, 00:55
- GPLv3 - mbbrutman, 28.05.2011, 00:20
- mTCP and SwsVPkt - Japheth, 31.05.2011, 09:03
- mTCP and SwsVPkt - mbbrutman, 01.06.2011, 03:11
- mTCP and SwsVPkt - Japheth, 01.06.2011, 13:14
- mTCP and SwsVPkt - mbbrutman, 01.06.2011, 15:04
- polling - ecm, 01.06.2011, 16:07
- polling - Japheth, 01.06.2011, 17:12
- polling - ecm, 01.06.2011, 17:27
- polling - Japheth, 01.06.2011, 17:50
- polling - ecm, 01.06.2011, 17:55
- polling - Japheth, 01.06.2011, 18:39
- polling - ecm, 01.06.2011, 18:49
- polling - Japheth, 01.06.2011, 18:39
- polling - ecm, 01.06.2011, 17:55
- polling - Japheth, 01.06.2011, 17:50
- polling - ecm, 01.06.2011, 17:27
- polling - Japheth, 01.06.2011, 17:12
- mTCP and SwsVPkt - Japheth, 01.06.2011, 13:14
- mTCP and SwsVPkt - mbbrutman, 01.06.2011, 03:11
- mTCP GPL - ecm, 27.05.2011, 23:58