Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

GPL: either version 3 of the license, or any later version (Announce)

posted by ecm Homepage E-mail, Düsseldorf, Germany, 28.05.2011, 01:18

> As I interpret it the text embedded within in files containing code contain
> the answer to the question:

Yes, I agree.

> My understanding is that the documentation does not need to be GPLed
> explicitly. If it does I can correct that at any time.

I don't think that would be necessary. What I suggested was only to add a statement indicating the precise license/versions to the documentation so that users looking for that information can find it readily available in the documentation, instead of having to look into source code files.

> My intent isn't to get into "license" wars ..

Don't you remember our last? That was way larger than this ;-)

I don't prefer GPL (2, 3, or any later version) for what I write and that is really all there is to say on the matter of software licensing preferences right now. I only wanted to point out what I have pointed out now.

> it is to share the code.

That is understood.

 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22632 Postings in 2109 Threads, 402 registered users, 369 users online (0 registered, 369 guests)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum