Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

polling (Announce)

posted by mbbrutman Homepage, Washington, USA, 18.07.2011, 17:41

Ok, you have me convinced .. I'll ignore INT 28 unless it comes up at a party during conversation.

As for INT 2F/1680, I will test it in a few environments and with DOSIDLE/SLEEPVM. Both of those are new to me - the old hardware that I run doesn't have an APM BIOS and is not task switching in any way, so I've been ignoring the fact that my code looks like a CPU hog.


Thanks again!
Mike

---
mTCP - TCP/IP apps for vintage DOS machines!
http://www.brutman.com/mTCP

 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22632 Postings in 2109 Threads, 402 registered users, 376 users online (0 registered, 376 guests)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum