MASM 5.10, RxDOS, DOS-C FreeDOS kernel ASM vs C (Announce)
> The code should be tiny enough to get adjusted to a more modern ASM
> standard
there is no such thing like a "more modern ASM standard"!
There are some not very convincing ASM dialects implemented by NASM, FASM, ...
> Indeed, an ASM FreeDOS kernel would be much better
Using ASM might improve (=decrease) the FreeDOS kernel size by 1 or 2 kB, but speed most likely won't be affected significantly.
> It works ... the performance is suboptimal, there are some bugs, doesn't
> compile with FASM and I can't contribute to the kernel ... not ideal, but
> no better choice by now
before people let you contribute to something as important as the FreeDOS kernel you first have to prove that you can write something useful at all, not just OS detectors.
---
MS-DOS forever!
Complete thread:
- Jack's drivers updated - Laaca, 13.10.2007, 13:48 (Announce)
- Corrected UIDE Coming. - Jack, 13.10.2007, 16:56
- Jack's drivers updated - Japheth, 14.10.2007, 11:17
- MASM 5.10 - lucho, 14.10.2007, 18:35
- Clarification - lucho, 14.10.2007, 18:41
- MASM 5.10 - rr, 15.10.2007, 12:54
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - lucho, 15.10.2007, 18:23
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - rr, 15.10.2007, 20:57
- Open source development prohibited with MA$M32 ?!? - DOS386, 16.10.2007, 01:53
- Open source development prohibited with MA$M32 ?!? - rr, 16.10.2007, 09:51
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - Steve, 16.10.2007, 13:35
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - Japheth, 16.10.2007, 19:31
- Steve Hutchesson's weird "MASM32" licence - lucho, 16.10.2007, 19:44
- Steve Hutchesson's weird "MASM32" licence - Rugxulo, 17.10.2007, 01:33
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - sol, 29.10.2007, 17:12
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - Rugxulo, 30.10.2007, 05:23
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - sol, 30.10.2007, 16:55
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - Rugxulo, 31.10.2007, 00:37
- Open source development NOT prohibited with MASM! - lucho, 31.10.2007, 20:24
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - sol, 30.10.2007, 16:55
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - Rugxulo, 30.10.2007, 05:23
- If So, DELETE Your "Links". - Jack, 15.10.2007, 18:51
- If So, DELETE Your "Links". - lucho, 15.10.2007, 19:07
- don't worry - Rugxulo, 15.10.2007, 19:56
- If So, DELETE Your "Links". - Japheth, 15.10.2007, 23:02
- If So, DELETE Your "Links". - lucho, 15.10.2007, 19:07
- Still "Linked", I See! - Jack, 15.10.2007, 20:22
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - lucho, 15.10.2007, 18:23
- MASM 5.10 - Japheth, 15.10.2007, 14:55
- MASM 5.10 - lucho, 15.10.2007, 18:18
- MASM 5.10 - Japheth, 16.10.2007, 14:06
- MASM 5.10 and WASM - lucho, 16.10.2007, 17:44
- MASM 5.10 and WASM - Japheth, 16.10.2007, 18:06
- WASM - lucho, 16.10.2007, 18:41
- MASM 5.10 and WASM - Japheth, 16.10.2007, 18:06
- MASM 5.10 and WASM - lucho, 16.10.2007, 17:44
- MASM 5.10 - Japheth, 16.10.2007, 14:06
- NOT Responsible For Other Assemblers!! - Jack, 16.10.2007, 16:11
- MASM 5.10, RxDOS, DOS-C - lucho, 17.10.2007, 08:47
- MASM 5.10? No! - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 10:06
- DOS-C, RxDOS, EDR-DOS, MASM 5.10 - lucho, 17.10.2007, 12:24
- Quantity issues - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 12:54
- 99% of DOS users run DOS in a Virtual Machine ?!? - lucho, 17.10.2007, 13:29
- 99% of DOS users run DOS in a Virtual Machine ?!? - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 14:19
- Real DOS is still alive! - lucho, 17.10.2007, 14:32
- 99% of DOS users run DOS in a Virtual Machine ?!? - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 14:19
- Quantity issues - Khusraw, 17.10.2007, 17:20
- Hello - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 18:21
- Hello - Khusraw, 17.10.2007, 18:31
- Hello - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 19:12
- Asynchronous synchronisation to ethics - lucho, 17.10.2007, 19:33
- Asynchronous synchronisation to ethics - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 19:55
- The German proverb about flies and something censored twice - lucho, 17.10.2007, 20:26
- The German proverb about flies and something censored twice - tom, 17.10.2007, 20:33
- Efficiency still counts! - lucho, 17.10.2007, 20:55
- The German proverb about flies and something censored twice - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 21:08
- The German proverb about flies and something censored twice - tom, 17.10.2007, 20:33
- Asynchronous synchronisation to ethics - Khusraw, 17.10.2007, 21:33
- Asynchronous synchronisation to ethics - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 21:41
- The German proverb about flies and something censored twice - lucho, 17.10.2007, 20:26
- Asynchronous synchronisation to ethics - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 19:55
- Hello - Khusraw, 17.10.2007, 19:48
- Asynchronous synchronisation to ethics - lucho, 17.10.2007, 19:33
- Hello - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 19:12
- Hello - Khusraw, 17.10.2007, 18:31
- Hello - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 18:21
- Quantity issues - DOS386, 24.10.2007, 02:41
- 99% of DOS users run DOS in a Virtual Machine ?!? - lucho, 17.10.2007, 13:29
- PRIDE Issues!! - Jack, 17.10.2007, 13:31
- Anyone Want a 1.75K UIDEJR?? - Jack, 17.10.2007, 20:09
- Quantity issues - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 12:54
- DOS-C, RxDOS, EDR-DOS, MASM 5.10 - lucho, 17.10.2007, 12:24
- MASM 5.10, RxDOS, DOS-C FreeDOS kernel ASM vs C - DOS386, 24.10.2007, 02:58
- MASM 5.10, RxDOS, DOS-C FreeDOS kernel ASM vs C - Japheth, 24.10.2007, 15:08
- RxDOS. ASM vs C kernels. Cluster alocation of FreeDOS - lucho, 24.10.2007, 15:57
- MASM 5.10, WASM, Po-ASM, convincing "dialects" - DOS386, 25.10.2007, 06:41
- MASM 5.10, WASM, Po-ASM, convincing "dialects" - Japheth, 25.10.2007, 07:55
- MASM 5.10, WASM, Po-ASM, convincing "dialects" - Rugxulo, 26.10.2007, 02:32
- MASM 5.10, WASM, Po-ASM, convincing "dialects" - Japheth, 25.10.2007, 07:55
- recompiling the FreeDOS kernel -- easy as pie - Rugxulo, 26.10.2007, 04:15
- recompiling the FreeDOS kernel -- easy as pie - DOS386, 26.10.2007, 08:18
- recompiling the FreeDOS kernel -- easy as pie - Rugxulo, 27.10.2007, 14:20
- RxDOS - lucho, 27.10.2007, 17:35
- RxDOS - Rugxulo, 28.10.2007, 02:01
- RxDOS | C vs ASM | purism | empty RX at SF ? - DOS386, 28.10.2007, 02:09
- RxDOS vs DOS-C - lucho, 28.10.2007, 09:45
- RxDOS vs DOS-C - tom, 29.10.2007, 11:23
- RxDOS vs DOS-C - Rugxulo, 29.10.2007, 13:53
- RxDOS vs DOS-C - lucho, 28.10.2007, 09:45
- RxDOS - Steve, 28.10.2007, 04:57
- RxDOS | C vs ASM | purism | empty RX at SF ? - DOS386, 28.10.2007, 02:09
- RxDOS - Rugxulo, 28.10.2007, 02:01
- RxDOS - lucho, 27.10.2007, 17:35
- recompiling the FreeDOS kernel -- easy as pie - Rugxulo, 27.10.2007, 14:20
- recompiling the FreeDOS kernel -- easy as pie - DOS386, 26.10.2007, 08:18
- MASM 5.10, RxDOS, DOS-C FreeDOS kernel ASM vs C - Japheth, 24.10.2007, 15:08
- MASM 5.10? No! - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 10:06
- "C" For Systems Work Is ... - Jack, 17.10.2007, 13:13
- Bloatware! - lucho, 17.10.2007, 14:27
- Please not another C vs. ASM debate! - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 16:02
- Bloatware is not just "C vs. Assembler" - lucho, 17.10.2007, 19:13
- Then "Keepen Zie Mouth SHUT"!! - Jack, 17.10.2007, 16:09
- Please not another C vs. ASM debate! - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 16:02
- "C" For Systems Work Is ... - Steve, 25.10.2007, 15:12
- Bloatware! - lucho, 17.10.2007, 14:27
- MASM 5.10, RxDOS, DOS-C - lucho, 17.10.2007, 08:47
- MASM 5.10 - lucho, 15.10.2007, 18:18
- MASM 5.10 - Jack, 15.10.2007, 18:22
- MASM 5.10 - lucho, 14.10.2007, 18:35
- Corrected UIDE Available. - Jack, 14.10.2007, 14:44
- Corrected UIDE Available. - lucho, 15.10.2007, 07:28