Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

MASM 5.10, RxDOS, DOS-C FreeDOS kernel ASM vs C (Announce)

posted by Japheth Homepage, Germany (South), 24.10.2007, 15:08

> The code should be tiny enough to get adjusted to a more modern ASM
> standard ;-)

there is no such thing like a "more modern ASM standard"!

There are some not very convincing ASM dialects implemented by NASM, FASM, ...

> Indeed, an ASM FreeDOS kernel would be much better :-|

Using ASM might improve (=decrease) the FreeDOS kernel size by 1 or 2 kB, but speed most likely won't be affected significantly.

> It works ... the performance is suboptimal, there are some bugs, doesn't
> compile with FASM and I can't contribute to the kernel ... not ideal, but
> no better choice by now :-|

before people let you contribute to something as important as the FreeDOS kernel you first have to prove that you can write something useful at all, not just OS detectors. :-D

---
MS-DOS forever!

 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22632 Postings in 2109 Threads, 402 registered users, 482 users online (0 registered, 482 guests)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum