NOT Responsible For Other Assemblers!! (Announce)
> Adding a comment for WASM users might be useful.
Another "non-issue", by one who has ADMITTED he enjoys being the
cause of only TROUBLE, as anyone can read here:
<http://www.bttr-software.de/forum/forum_entry.php?id=914>
I am not the "babysitter" for NASM, TASM, WASM, or "WhateverSM".
For 17 years, V5.1 MASM has been my assembler. People who wish
some other assembler must take RESPONSIBILITY for this decision.
If that assembler is "not compatible" with previously acceptable
assembly-language standards, there is an easy and fast solution:
Use V5.1 MASM instead.
Complete thread:
- Jack's drivers updated - Laaca, 13.10.2007, 13:48 (Announce)
- Corrected UIDE Coming. - Jack, 13.10.2007, 16:56
- Jack's drivers updated - Japheth, 14.10.2007, 11:17
- MASM 5.10 - lucho, 14.10.2007, 18:35
- Clarification - lucho, 14.10.2007, 18:41
- MASM 5.10 - rr, 15.10.2007, 12:54
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - lucho, 15.10.2007, 18:23
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - rr, 15.10.2007, 20:57
- Open source development prohibited with MA$M32 ?!? - DOS386, 16.10.2007, 01:53
- Open source development prohibited with MA$M32 ?!? - rr, 16.10.2007, 09:51
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - Steve, 16.10.2007, 13:35
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - Japheth, 16.10.2007, 19:31
- Steve Hutchesson's weird "MASM32" licence - lucho, 16.10.2007, 19:44
- Steve Hutchesson's weird "MASM32" licence - Rugxulo, 17.10.2007, 01:33
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - sol, 29.10.2007, 17:12
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - Rugxulo, 30.10.2007, 05:23
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - sol, 30.10.2007, 16:55
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - Rugxulo, 31.10.2007, 00:37
- Open source development NOT prohibited with MASM! - lucho, 31.10.2007, 20:24
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - sol, 30.10.2007, 16:55
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - Rugxulo, 30.10.2007, 05:23
- If So, DELETE Your "Links". - Jack, 15.10.2007, 18:51
- If So, DELETE Your "Links". - lucho, 15.10.2007, 19:07
- don't worry - Rugxulo, 15.10.2007, 19:56
- If So, DELETE Your "Links". - Japheth, 15.10.2007, 23:02
- If So, DELETE Your "Links". - lucho, 15.10.2007, 19:07
- Still "Linked", I See! - Jack, 15.10.2007, 20:22
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - lucho, 15.10.2007, 18:23
- MASM 5.10 - Japheth, 15.10.2007, 14:55
- MASM 5.10 - lucho, 15.10.2007, 18:18
- MASM 5.10 - Japheth, 16.10.2007, 14:06
- MASM 5.10 and WASM - lucho, 16.10.2007, 17:44
- MASM 5.10 and WASM - Japheth, 16.10.2007, 18:06
- WASM - lucho, 16.10.2007, 18:41
- MASM 5.10 and WASM - Japheth, 16.10.2007, 18:06
- MASM 5.10 and WASM - lucho, 16.10.2007, 17:44
- MASM 5.10 - Japheth, 16.10.2007, 14:06
- NOT Responsible For Other Assemblers!! - Jack, 16.10.2007, 16:11
- MASM 5.10, RxDOS, DOS-C - lucho, 17.10.2007, 08:47
- MASM 5.10? No! - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 10:06
- DOS-C, RxDOS, EDR-DOS, MASM 5.10 - lucho, 17.10.2007, 12:24
- Quantity issues - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 12:54
- 99% of DOS users run DOS in a Virtual Machine ?!? - lucho, 17.10.2007, 13:29
- 99% of DOS users run DOS in a Virtual Machine ?!? - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 14:19
- Real DOS is still alive! - lucho, 17.10.2007, 14:32
- 99% of DOS users run DOS in a Virtual Machine ?!? - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 14:19
- Quantity issues - Khusraw, 17.10.2007, 17:20
- Hello - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 18:21
- Hello - Khusraw, 17.10.2007, 18:31
- Hello - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 19:12
- Asynchronous synchronisation to ethics - lucho, 17.10.2007, 19:33
- Asynchronous synchronisation to ethics - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 19:55
- The German proverb about flies and something censored twice - lucho, 17.10.2007, 20:26
- The German proverb about flies and something censored twice - tom, 17.10.2007, 20:33
- Efficiency still counts! - lucho, 17.10.2007, 20:55
- The German proverb about flies and something censored twice - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 21:08
- The German proverb about flies and something censored twice - tom, 17.10.2007, 20:33
- Asynchronous synchronisation to ethics - Khusraw, 17.10.2007, 21:33
- Asynchronous synchronisation to ethics - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 21:41
- The German proverb about flies and something censored twice - lucho, 17.10.2007, 20:26
- Asynchronous synchronisation to ethics - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 19:55
- Hello - Khusraw, 17.10.2007, 19:48
- Asynchronous synchronisation to ethics - lucho, 17.10.2007, 19:33
- Hello - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 19:12
- Hello - Khusraw, 17.10.2007, 18:31
- Hello - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 18:21
- Quantity issues - DOS386, 24.10.2007, 02:41
- 99% of DOS users run DOS in a Virtual Machine ?!? - lucho, 17.10.2007, 13:29
- PRIDE Issues!! - Jack, 17.10.2007, 13:31
- Anyone Want a 1.75K UIDEJR?? - Jack, 17.10.2007, 20:09
- Quantity issues - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 12:54
- DOS-C, RxDOS, EDR-DOS, MASM 5.10 - lucho, 17.10.2007, 12:24
- MASM 5.10, RxDOS, DOS-C FreeDOS kernel ASM vs C - DOS386, 24.10.2007, 02:58
- MASM 5.10, RxDOS, DOS-C FreeDOS kernel ASM vs C - Japheth, 24.10.2007, 15:08
- RxDOS. ASM vs C kernels. Cluster alocation of FreeDOS - lucho, 24.10.2007, 15:57
- MASM 5.10, WASM, Po-ASM, convincing "dialects" - DOS386, 25.10.2007, 06:41
- MASM 5.10, WASM, Po-ASM, convincing "dialects" - Japheth, 25.10.2007, 07:55
- MASM 5.10, WASM, Po-ASM, convincing "dialects" - Rugxulo, 26.10.2007, 02:32
- MASM 5.10, WASM, Po-ASM, convincing "dialects" - Japheth, 25.10.2007, 07:55
- recompiling the FreeDOS kernel -- easy as pie - Rugxulo, 26.10.2007, 04:15
- recompiling the FreeDOS kernel -- easy as pie - DOS386, 26.10.2007, 08:18
- recompiling the FreeDOS kernel -- easy as pie - Rugxulo, 27.10.2007, 14:20
- RxDOS - lucho, 27.10.2007, 17:35
- RxDOS - Rugxulo, 28.10.2007, 02:01
- RxDOS | C vs ASM | purism | empty RX at SF ? - DOS386, 28.10.2007, 02:09
- RxDOS vs DOS-C - lucho, 28.10.2007, 09:45
- RxDOS vs DOS-C - tom, 29.10.2007, 11:23
- RxDOS vs DOS-C - Rugxulo, 29.10.2007, 13:53
- RxDOS vs DOS-C - lucho, 28.10.2007, 09:45
- RxDOS - Steve, 28.10.2007, 04:57
- RxDOS | C vs ASM | purism | empty RX at SF ? - DOS386, 28.10.2007, 02:09
- RxDOS - Rugxulo, 28.10.2007, 02:01
- RxDOS - lucho, 27.10.2007, 17:35
- recompiling the FreeDOS kernel -- easy as pie - Rugxulo, 27.10.2007, 14:20
- recompiling the FreeDOS kernel -- easy as pie - DOS386, 26.10.2007, 08:18
- MASM 5.10, RxDOS, DOS-C FreeDOS kernel ASM vs C - Japheth, 24.10.2007, 15:08
- MASM 5.10? No! - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 10:06
- "C" For Systems Work Is ... - Jack, 17.10.2007, 13:13
- Bloatware! - lucho, 17.10.2007, 14:27
- Please not another C vs. ASM debate! - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 16:02
- Bloatware is not just "C vs. Assembler" - lucho, 17.10.2007, 19:13
- Then "Keepen Zie Mouth SHUT"!! - Jack, 17.10.2007, 16:09
- Please not another C vs. ASM debate! - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 16:02
- "C" For Systems Work Is ... - Steve, 25.10.2007, 15:12
- Bloatware! - lucho, 17.10.2007, 14:27
- MASM 5.10, RxDOS, DOS-C - lucho, 17.10.2007, 08:47
- MASM 5.10 - lucho, 15.10.2007, 18:18
- MASM 5.10 - Jack, 15.10.2007, 18:22
- MASM 5.10 - lucho, 14.10.2007, 18:35
- Corrected UIDE Available. - Jack, 14.10.2007, 14:44
- Corrected UIDE Available. - lucho, 15.10.2007, 07:28